Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kareldegendt
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 9

    #1

    weird kmer-content peak in RNA-seq data

    Hi all,

    I have attached a pic of the kmer-content of my RNA-seq experiment.
    Input was a fastq-file, 51bp reads, over 30 million reads, RNA-seq on an Illumina Hiseq.
    At about the 21st position in the reads, I see the AAAAA 5-mer suddenly rising. Does anyone have a clue what might be causing that? I see it in all my samples. RNA samples were collected after arresting translation with cycloheximide.
    Could it be that something is wrong with the fragment size? If so, how do I check that??

    Thanks a million!

    Karel
    Attached Files
  • kalidaemon
    Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 14

    #2
    Hi Karel
    It's possible that the AAAA k-mer that you're seeing at around 21 base pairs are arrested transcripts caused by cyclohexamide treatment. You can check this possibility out by looking at the length distribution plot in FASTQC. However, if you see uniform 51 base pair reads, this doesn't mean that your AAAA k-mer is not due to terminated transcripts because you may have sequenced the 3' UTR. I would probably try to address this computationally by segregating out the reads with the AAAA k-mer at 21 bases. I would then trim them and run the shorter (ie 19 bp) and longer (ie 50 bp) reads through my analyis pipeline separately. I'm assuming the goal of your experiment is looking at genes that are transcribed rapidly or with whatever stimulus you gave your cells before Chx treatment vs slowly/not in response to the stimulus. This should tell you something about these genes.

    Comment

    • mparida
      Member
      • Mar 2012
      • 15

      #3
      Hi
      I think the kmer contents of my data is pretty darn bad. Is there anyway to filter them or trim them from my data and analyze them separately.
      Any useful comment is highly appreciated.
      Attached Files

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • kinpict.com
        Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by kinpict.com
        The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
        Today, 06:37 PM
      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2





        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
        10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
      2 responses
      56 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post kinpict.com  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      175 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...