Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wichne
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 2

    Celera assembler and metagenomic data - no contigs?

    Hi, I'm trying to assemble some 100bp paired-end illumina reads using CA-7.0.

    The run did not fail, but resulted in no contigs. 70% of my reads were, however, in degenerate contigs.

    Is this expected because of a) short read lengths b) replicate sequences c) variation in the natural population d) all of the above (plus other stuff not listed)?

    I did an assembly of a subset of this data that went together quite nicely.

    thanks,
    Bill

    specfile:
    Code:
    fakeUIDs      = 1  #default 0
    
    #  TRIMMING
    vectorTrimmer  =  ca  # default ca; others figaro, umd
    doOverlapBasedTrimming = 1 # default 1
    obtOverlapper   =  ovl
    mbtConcurrency = 4
    mbtThreads = 4
    
    #  MERYL configuration
    merylMemory   = 2000   # default 800MB
    merylThreads  = 4      # default 1
    
    # OVERLAPPER configuration
    ovlOverlapper    = ovl      # default is ovl
    merSize       = 14 # default is 22
    
    utgErrorRate=0.03
    utgErrorLimit=2.5  # Allow mismatches over and above the utgErrorRate. This helps with Illumina reads.
    ovlErrorRate=0.05 # Larger than utg to allow for correction.
    cnsErrorRate=0.06 # Larger than utg to avoid occasional consensus failures
    cgwErrorRate=0.06 # Larger than utg to allow contig merges across high-error ends
    
    gkpFixInsertSizes      = 1
    
    doDeDuplication        = 1
    doChimeraDetection     = normal
    
    frgCorrConcurrency=4
    ovlCorrConcurrency=4
    
    unitigger     = bog
    utgBubblePopping = 1
    utgGenomeSize=1500000  # <- !!! I accidentally left this in from a different run
    
    doResolveSurrogates=1
    doToggle = 1

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
    by SEQadmin2



    Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

    There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
    Yesterday, 05:17 AM
  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
0 responses
6 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
0 responses
8 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
31 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
29 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...