Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • polsum
    Member
    • May 2009
    • 32

    #1

    edgeR Normalization question

    The edgeR manual gives us three examples for DE analysis with each example normalizing the data in different manner.

    In the case study 1, the Normalization was done by calcNormFactors. In the case study 2 however, only counts per million or cpm was calculated and no calcNormFactors was used. In the case study 3, both cpm and calcNormFactors was used. In this 3rd example, we are essentially modifying the data two times before performing DE analysis which is strange to me.

    I basically want to perform miRNA DE analysis between two samples (each with 3 replicates). Which of the above methods is applicable for me?

    Can any one please educate me? thanks in advance.
  • Gordon Smyth
    Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 91

    #2
    Dear polsum,

    The edgeR User's Guide contains five case studies, and all are normalized exactly the same way, except for the second which deals with deepSAGE data for which simple library size normalization was considered sufficient.

    You are mis-understanding the role of cpm, which are used only as descriptive quantities for data exploration in edgeR, not as part of the formal normalization or differential expression process.

    We obviously recommend, unless there are good reasons otherwise, that you use calcNormFactors() for an RNA-Seq analysis.

    Note that edgeR is a Bioconductor package, so the way to get a prompt answer is to post your question to the Bioconductor mailing list. See the section "how to get help" in the edgeR User's Guide.

    It also seems that your version of edgeR must be very old. Could I suggest that you update?

    Gordon

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
      by SEQadmin2



      CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

      Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
      ...
      07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
      by SEQadmin2


      Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

      The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
      ...
      07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
    0 responses
    17 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
    0 responses
    33 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
    0 responses
    43 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...