Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • maubp
    replied
    Originally posted by MikeT View Post
    Already tried, but when I do it and then use the "Parse BLAST output" command it still doesn't recognize the file as a .xml BLAST output.
    In that case (assuming you are using the public Galaxy), write to the galaxy-users mailing list and offer to share a history with the problematic XML file with them for diagnosis.
    Originally posted by MikeT View Post
    Are you sure? Because the -help section for the tool explicitly says that it expects some ASN.1 files and .XMLs. Anyway, how can I reformat my output as an ASN.1 file?
    I only have BLAST 2.2.25+ installed on this machine (the latest is now 2.2.26), and it doesn't say that in the 'blast_formatter -help' text. I doesn't say much at all about the -archive argument, but the website is pretty clear it expects a BLAST archive format (ASN.1) file: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1763/

    Leave a comment:


  • MikeT
    replied
    Originally posted by maubp View Post
    That does look like BLAST XML.

    It is possible Galaxy failed to auto-detect the file type. You can set this explicitly when you upload a file to Galaxy. Or, after uploading from the history entry use the "pencil" icon ("edit attributes") to change the filetype.
    Already tried, but when I do it and then use the "Parse BLAST output" command it still doesn't recognize the file as a .xml BLAST output.


    Originally posted by maubp View Post
    The NCBI tool blast_formatter does not expect an XML input, rather an ASN.1 file.
    Are you sure? Because the -help section for the tool explicitly says that it expects some ASN.1 files and .XMLs. Anyway, how can I reformat my output as an ASN.1 file?

    -MikeT

    Leave a comment:


  • maubp
    replied
    Originally posted by MikeT View Post
    Here's a screenshot of the first lines:

    Hope it helps!
    That does look like BLAST XML.

    It is possible Galaxy failed to auto-detect the file type. You can set this explicitly when you upload a file to Galaxy. Or, after uploading from the history entry use the "pencil" icon ("edit attributes") to change the filetype.

    Originally posted by MikeT View Post
    Sadly, as I run blast_formatter on the .xml it appears to be an invalid file format
    The NCBI tool blast_formatter does not expect an XML input, rather an ASN.1 file.

    Leave a comment:


  • MikeT
    replied
    Here's a screenshot of the first lines:

    Hope it helps!

    -MikeT

    Leave a comment:


  • maubp
    replied
    Can you show us the first 10 lines or so using the [ code ] and [ /code ] forum tags to preserve the formatting? Try using the Unix command 'head' for this,

    head -n 10 example.xml

    Leave a comment:


  • MikeT
    started a topic CAMERA Blast output - invalid XML?

    CAMERA Blast output - invalid XML?

    Hi all,
    I've ran some of my datasets on the tBLASTx program on the CAMERA portal. Since the hit number was quite big, the portal let me download the output as a .xml file.
    Sadly, as I run blast_formatter on the .xml it appears to be an invalid file format: Galaxy tells me it's a simple .txt, instead of a .xml. How can I reformat it?

    -MikeT

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
    by SEQadmin2


    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
    ...
    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
40 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
29 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
0 responses
41 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
0 responses
45 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...