Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lyz1030
    Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 33

    #1

    calculating the coverage

    Hi all

    If there are two reads convering a position, and one read happens to have a delete in this position. I want to know the coverage (or the read depth) in position 5, 1 or 2? What is the difference between the coverage and the read depth? If the quality is below the base quality threshold, what is the coverage then?

    123456789
    AGGGTCTCC
    AGGG.CTCC

    Thanks.
  • twaddlac
    Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 49

    #2
    There are a number of tools that can do this, but the two software suites that are widely used are samtools (http://samtools.sourceforge.net/) and GATK (http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsa/wi...alysis_Toolkit) and picard (http://picard.sourceforge.net/comman...overview.shtml)

    Unfortunately people use depth and coverage, indicating that there is 10x coverage of nth base, alternatively 10x depth of nth base. The way that I use them is depth is used to describe how many reads are covering nth base and coverage longitudinal in, e.g. 90/100 bases of the reference are covered.

    Depth of coverage is also a term that is used to describe the average depth of each base across the reference.

    The result when calculating the coverage at a low quality base is dependent upon the software and its settings. If you lower the cutoff then you'll see it. They also have a threshold for mapping quality which may be of interest to you.

    Comment

    • lyz1030
      Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 33

      #3
      Thanks. I want to know if the 'delete base' should be excluded when calculating?

      Comment

      • twaddlac
        Member
        • Feb 2011
        • 49

        #4
        Well that depends on your study. If you're looking for a variant then I would keep in there because, depending upon the base and map qualities, it may be a true variant. However, if you're generating mapping statistics (depth, coverage, depth of coverage) then I would not.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • kinpict.com
          Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by kinpict.com
          The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
          Today, 06:37 PM
        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2





          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
          10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
        2 responses
        56 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post kinpict.com  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        175 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...