Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rikkomba
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 4

    #1

    [ChIP-seq] MACS 1.4: assertion error

    HI,

    I just started working with ChIP-seq and I am using MACS to predict binding sites for a fungal genome (12MB).
    As mentioned here, I am getting the same problem as some previous users: I get an assertion error when calculating negative peaks, and I only managed to solve the problem by reducing the amount of data to 75%, i.e. if the amount of reads goes to 80% or more of the original amount, I will get the error again.

    I have a control file with 31M 36bp single reads (4.1GB) and a sample file
    with 28M 36bp single reads (3.6GB).
    I tried it both a laptop (4GB RAM) and a server (16GB RAM), in
    both cases it was using 1.6GB of memory and was behaving the same way. I also tried it on Cistrome, idem.
    Changing the mfold parameter didn't help.
    With 75% of the data I did get sensible results, but I am not sure how can I move on discarding 25% of a dataset... it just adds another layer of complexity to the analysis.

    Does anybody have an idea of the cause of the problem, and of the reason
    why reducing the amount of data works?
    Also, if anybody knows any alternative, valid tool, feel free to suggest
    Thanks!
  • taoliu
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 3

    #2
    I just answered this question in MACS user group, however, since you asked in seqanswer, I re-post it here.


    This error normally happens when you have too many reads in a very small genome. In your case, you use a whole GA2 lane to sequence a single factor in a genome like E coli. Then due to the extremely high coverage, this overflow error occurs since my function doesn't expect a poisson rate higher than 740...

    In practice, you'd better consider using multiplex to fully use a single lane to sequence multiple factors or a single factor in multiple conditions/time points. 30million reads for a single experiment on a 4million genome is a big waste -- you can even assemble the genome for this species now...

    Anyway, since you have already got your 30millions reads, what you can do ( instead of waiting me to fix it (: ) is to subsample your sequencing reads. My impression for human chip-seq, if you want to reach saturation for peak detection, you need about 300 million reads ( from our unpublished Nat Method paper ) which is equivalent to 0.5million reads in E coli . You can use "samtools view -s" to subsample a portion of your BAM file.
    梦蝶

    Comment

    • rikkomba
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 4

      #3
      Thanks for the explanation! I ll try with downsampling, then.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      10 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
      0 responses
      17 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...