Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • strob
    Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 84

    #1

    How two compare two assembly results? (not assembly tools)

    Hi,

    most of the time, people compare results, using the same dataset, but obtained from different tools (example: velvet vs. soapdenovo)

    I have however two independent datasets (solexa data, obtained from two different 'extraction' methods), on which I performed seperately a de novo assembly. So I have two assemblies, coming from different data, but coming from the same species. Now I would like to compare both assemblies and see which assembly is the most satisfying to me. I have questions like: is there overlap? Is one completely imbedded in the other? Are they complementary? etc.

    So simple: how to compare two independent de novo assemblies (same species)?

    Thanks
  • nickloman
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 355

    #2
    I would use Mauve to do this and visualise the output. If you had any reference-grade genomes that you would expect to be similar and preserve gene order (synteny) you could also add that in to guide which assembly is likely to be more accurate.

    Comment

    • maubp
      Peter (Biopython etc)
      • Jul 2009
      • 1544

      #3
      There is no easy answer - and it depends on what you are looking for.

      For example, further to Nick's excellent comments, you might want to run a gene caller on both and compare the gene sets. If you are interested in particular genes, then you could just try TBLASTN or BLASTN to see if they are in both draft genomes or not.

      Comment

      • strob
        Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 84

        #4
        I used two different methods to extract my DNA, which was than sequenced and assembled. I want now to know which method gave me the best results, by comparing the two assemblies. I want to find out if both methods give me the same data or if there is only a partial overlap.
        Mauve is nice to visualize, but limiting. I would more like to get some overall statistics

        Thanks already for the feedback

        Comment

        • nickloman
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2009
          • 355

          #5
          After you've generated a Mauve alignment you can use Mauve Assembly Metrics (http://code.google.com/p/ngopt/) to give you some stats, but this is designed to be used against some kind of baseline truth reference genome. But you could run it twice I guess with genome 1 as reference first time and genome 2 as reference second time in order to generate some numbers.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
            by SEQadmin2



            CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

            Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
            ...
            07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:13 AM
          0 responses
          10 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
          0 responses
          19 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
          0 responses
          17 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...