Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MeixiaZhao
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 9

    #1

    cufflinks confusing

    I have some confusings about cufflinks output file:
    1. Why the cufflinks output can match the isoforms but can not match the gene, like the first one:

    Gm01 Cufflinks transcript 51481 61502 1000 - . gene_id "CUFF.1"; transcript_id "PAC:16242891"; FPKM "0.4311150338"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "0.045514"; conf_hi "0.816716"; cov "0.409373"; full_read_support "no";
    Gm01 Cufflinks exon 51481 51625 1000 - . gene_id "CUFF.1"; transcript_id "PAC:16242891"; exon_number "1"; FPKM "0.4311150338"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "0.045514"; conf_hi "0.816716"; cov "0.409373";
    Gm01 Cufflinks exon 51828 51925 1000 - . gene_id "CUFF.1"; transcript_id "PAC:16242891"; exon_number "2"; FPKM "0.4311150338"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "0.045514"; conf_hi "0.816716"; cov "0.409373";
    Gm01 Cufflinks exon 52362 52465 1000 - . gene_id "CUFF.1"; transcript_id "PAC:16242891"; exon_number "3"; FPKM "0.4311150338"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "0.045514"; conf_hi "0.816716"; cov "0.409373";
    Gm01 Cufflinks exon 52517 52571 1000 - . gene_id "CUFF.1"; transcript_id "PAC:16242891"; exon_number "4"; FPKM "0.4311150338"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "0.045514"; conf_hi "0.816716"; cov "0.409373";
    Gm01 Cufflinks exon 52608 52639 1000 - . gene_id "CUFF.1"; transcript_id "PAC:16242891"; exon_number "

    gene_id "CUFF.1"; transcript_id "PAC:16242891"; PAC:16242891 in the reference annotated file is the transform of gene Glyma01g00270.1? Can I recognise this gene CUFF.1 as Glyma01g00270, and those two transcripts belong to this gene?

    2. I have noticed that many transcripts' FPKM value is 0.0000000000, should I exclude those transcripts? I suppose not. I just wondering wheather I need to set a FPKM cutoff after the output of cufflinks. Actually, even some transcript FPKM value is 0, it also can be significant expressed when using cuffdiff.
    Last edited by MeixiaZhao; 04-26-2012, 02:45 PM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...