Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MeixiaZhao
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 9

    cufflinks confusing

    I have some confusings about cufflinks output file:
    1. Why the cufflinks output can match the isoforms but can not match the gene, like the first one:

    Gm01 Cufflinks transcript 51481 61502 1000 - . gene_id "CUFF.1"; transcript_id "PAC:16242891"; FPKM "0.4311150338"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "0.045514"; conf_hi "0.816716"; cov "0.409373"; full_read_support "no";
    Gm01 Cufflinks exon 51481 51625 1000 - . gene_id "CUFF.1"; transcript_id "PAC:16242891"; exon_number "1"; FPKM "0.4311150338"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "0.045514"; conf_hi "0.816716"; cov "0.409373";
    Gm01 Cufflinks exon 51828 51925 1000 - . gene_id "CUFF.1"; transcript_id "PAC:16242891"; exon_number "2"; FPKM "0.4311150338"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "0.045514"; conf_hi "0.816716"; cov "0.409373";
    Gm01 Cufflinks exon 52362 52465 1000 - . gene_id "CUFF.1"; transcript_id "PAC:16242891"; exon_number "3"; FPKM "0.4311150338"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "0.045514"; conf_hi "0.816716"; cov "0.409373";
    Gm01 Cufflinks exon 52517 52571 1000 - . gene_id "CUFF.1"; transcript_id "PAC:16242891"; exon_number "4"; FPKM "0.4311150338"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "0.045514"; conf_hi "0.816716"; cov "0.409373";
    Gm01 Cufflinks exon 52608 52639 1000 - . gene_id "CUFF.1"; transcript_id "PAC:16242891"; exon_number "

    gene_id "CUFF.1"; transcript_id "PAC:16242891"; PAC:16242891 in the reference annotated file is the transform of gene Glyma01g00270.1? Can I recognise this gene CUFF.1 as Glyma01g00270, and those two transcripts belong to this gene?

    2. I have noticed that many transcripts' FPKM value is 0.0000000000, should I exclude those transcripts? I suppose not. I just wondering wheather I need to set a FPKM cutoff after the output of cufflinks. Actually, even some transcript FPKM value is 0, it also can be significant expressed when using cuffdiff.
    Last edited by MeixiaZhao; 04-26-2012, 02:45 PM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
14 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
15 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...