Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Alex Renwick
    Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 44

    #16
    Originally posted by epi View Post
    Thanks for commenting analyst, I just don't care about responses like Alex's. Unfortunately he is not the only person in public forums and in scientific world who like to get personal in scientific discussion. ... But overall this is an excellent forum ...
    I apologize if my tone sounded personal. My intent was to invite discussion that would clarify the points of disagreement. You seemed not to accept the unanimous opinion of the other commentors without quite saying why. I agree that this is an excellent forum, and it is so because people make an effort to understand each other and offer discussion. In this thread I saw that effort coming from one side only.

    Edit: After rereading it, I see I misunderstood your response to Heisman. I still think your conclusion is mistaken, but it's not the mistake I indicated previously.
    Last edited by Alex Renwick; 05-10-2012, 07:18 AM.

    Comment

    • epi
      Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 38

      #17
      Originally posted by Alex Renwick View Post
      My intent was to invite discussion that would clarify the points of disagreement.
      Nobody can imagine that after reading your message.

      Originally posted by Alex Renwick View Post
      You seemed not to accept the unanimous opinion of the other commentors without quite saying why.
      There is no unanimous opinion, and I did not disagree with anything. It is obvious I do not have an opinion that is why I am asking this question, please read title post of the thread.

      Originally posted by Alex Renwick View Post
      In this thread I saw that effort coming from one side only.

      I still think your conclusion is mistaken, but it's not the mistake I indicated previously.
      This sums up your attitude here. You are certain that others are at mistake, no matter what. if it is not one thing, it must be another. You are convinced that others are arguing and challenging the very foundation of your thoughts and understanding. Basically you suffer from the same mentality that you are accusing others of, and this seems difficult for you to fathom.

      Anyways, that's all I have to say, I am not going to continue this discussion as it is not a productive activity (for me).

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      32 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      34 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...