Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Burger
    Junior Member
    • May 2012
    • 3

    Software advice needed regarding SNP calling

    Hi all

    I would like your input on software to use for SNP calling from a pooled transcriptome sample, I have a whole genome (Eucalyptus grandis).

    The problem is the incorporation of splice junctions into my pipeline.
    -What should I map with? (so far I'm thinking Tophat)
    -What can I use for calling of SNPs? (As Tophat produces a BAM file this should be easy)

    All advice welcome. PS I'm working with Illumina paired end reads
  • cedance
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 108

    #2
    Tophat does great job of mapping. So it should be alright.

    As for SNP calling, there are plenty of softwares out there, but most of them are tuned not for RNA-seq I believe. Having said that, you could use samtools to call for variants and then supply that to GATK and then obtain SNPs from GATK pipeline by performing local realignment, quality recalibration etc... The GATK nature article is also a very interested read.

    Over the last few days, I have been reading about local realignment by SRMA and it seems impressive. So, I'd like to try that as well. I've seen many of them who have tried GATK realignment and SRMA preferring SRMA for local realignment.

    There are of course many other tools that are equally good. You could find a few in this seq-wiki

    There is also a Nature review on comparison of some of the tools here. I still think there are many things that needs improvement though.

    Comment

    • Burger
      Junior Member
      • May 2012
      • 3

      #3
      I was thinking of going the SAMtools and GATK route, thank you for the articles. Will have a read.

      Comment

      • paolo.kunder
        Member
        • Aug 2011
        • 93

        #4
        I am using samtools pileup with the alignment output of tophat (bam)

        Then analyze the output with VarScan.v2.2.11 pileup2snp, results are quite nice and straightforward,

        pk

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        55 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...