Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #1

    MeDIP-seq peak calling (with replicates)

    Hi all, I'm curious what people are using these days for finding peaks in MeDIP-seq data (I have two experimental conditions, each with replicates, and I'm interested in finding changes between them). I've browsed through a number of common tools, such as MACs, but they seem to suggest pooling biological replicates into a single .bed file for further analysis. I would assume that it's beneficial to exploit the presence of replicates for judging noise and am wondering if there's something else out there. Alternatively, if someone can point me to where this sort of issue is discussed in the MACs manual I'd appreciate it.

    Alternatively, do people recommend using MACs or a similar tool to give a first pass at finding peaks, which can then be used as regions of interest for other tools (which I suppose I could just write, but I assume others have already done that).
  • simonandrews
    Simon Andrews
    • May 2009
    • 870

    #2
    We wouldn't normally do peak detection for MeDIP as you'll end up selecting for high CpG content regions. We prefer to systematically analyse all regions (often splitting up by type - exons, promoters etc) which will still have some bias because of differing levels of observations, but does allow you to spot interesting things.

    Comment

    • rory
      Member
      • Aug 2008
      • 28

      #3
      We have analyzed MeDIP both using peak callers (MACS) and pre-defined regions (promoters, 3'UTR, introns, etc.). In any case, we keep the replicates separate, deriving different peaksets for each replicate in the peak-calling case.

      One we have peaks, we use the Bioconductor package DiffBind, which allows you to derive a consensus peakset, and then uses the distributions of enrichment scores in the replicates to identify differentially methylated regions.

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        rory: Thanks that makes sense and was what I figured needed to happen. I expect I'll just create a couple .bed files and merge them with bedtools prior to the normal count based tools used for everything else.

        simon: Unfortunately in my case we expect to not see any systemic regional (i.e., exons, promoters, etc.) differences between the datasets. I'll run those analyses anyway since that should be done anyway though.

        Thanks all

        Comment

        • drdna
          Member
          • May 2012
          • 76

          #5
          I would like to use diffbind for differential peak calling on peaksets generated using macs2. However, I cannot find information on the required format for the input peakset. Research tells me that the fourth column contains a "confidence' value. My guess is that this should be either the P-value or Q-value in the peaks.xls files coming from macs2. Please can someone enlighten me? Thanks.

          Comment

          • rory
            Member
            • Aug 2008
            • 28

            #6
            The easiest way to read MACS peaks into DiffBind is to specify the .xls files in the sample sheet and specify "macs" as the peak caller (either in a column of the sample sheet, or using the peakCaller="macs" in the call to dba(). This will use p-value as the score. Alternatively, you can convert the .xls to tab-separated text files, with the first three columns being the chromosome, start, and end of each peak, followed by as many score columns as you want. then set scoreCol= whichever column you want to use as a score.

            Ultimately, which peak caller scores shouldn't matter much, as they will be discarded after you call dba.count() to determine the enrichment for each merged peak in every sample.

            Cheers-
            Rory

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              Yesterday, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            8 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            17 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
            0 responses
            15 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...