Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • elfuser
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 16

    #1

    Quality of single sequencing read

    What is the best way to represent the quality of a single sequencing read with one value? I know the phred scores of each base, but I am looking to summarize that into one value. I thought the average could be an option or perhaps adding the scores. Is there a standard or which one would be more informative?
    Thanks so much
  • elfuser
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 16

    #2
    I saw in a post that a way of representing this could be by calculating the percentage of q20 or q30 bases in the read. But I think that this may not be as sensitive. Any suggestions

    Comment

    • TonyBrooks
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2009
      • 303

      #3
      I thought the consensus is the % of bases >Q30 at the final base. You'll also need to know the read length as quality drops each cycle so any Q-score without a read-length is meaningless. You would expect a higher % for shorter reads.

      Comment

      • elfuser
        Member
        • Dec 2009
        • 16

        #4
        I am using illumina PE where I think the read length is always the same. Now I'm guessing you take the final base into account because the quality is always the same or drops from the beginning of the read to the end. Thanks

        Comment

        • TonyBrooks
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2009
          • 303

          #5
          Correct. The quality should alway drop once passed the initial few bases where they appear to increase (an artefact of the RTA software). I think if you go to the Illumina website they give you estimated specs of each instrument described as % bases >Q30 for a few types of read variety.

          Comment

          • pmiguel
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2008
            • 2328

            #6
            Originally posted by elfuser View Post
            What is the best way to represent the quality of a single sequencing read with one value? I know the phred scores of each base, but I am looking to summarize that into one value. I thought the average could be an option or perhaps adding the scores. Is there a standard or which one would be more informative?
            Thanks so much
            Well, the quality of a given base is and estimation of its probability of being a miscall.

            So you could represent the probability of a read having zero, one, two or whatever errors in it or less. For example, trivially, take a 100 base read with quality values that are all 30. Chance of having zero errors would be 0.999^100 would be about 90.5%. More generally you can convert all the quality values into error probabilities and use their product to tell you what the chance of the read containing a miscall is.

            --
            Phillip

            Comment

            • mathew
              Member
              • Jan 2011
              • 81

              #7
              quality of single end reads

              Is it quite common to have very high number of duplicates (PCR) in single end read should we also drop them or not I am taking about 40% of total reads in an RNA-seq.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              31 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              22 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              39 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              45 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...