Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CarlElit
    Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 14

    #1

    Strand specific tophat/cufflinks

    Dear all,

    I have a strand-specific RNA-seq library to assemble (Illumina). I would like to use TopHat/Cufflinks. From the manual of TopHat, it says,

    "--library-type TopHat will treat the reads as strand specific. Every read alignment will have an XS attribute tag. Consider supplying library type options below to select the correct RNA-seq protocol."

    Does it mean that TopHat only supports strand-specific protocols? I use option "--library-type fr-unstranded" to run, does it mean it runs in a strand-specific way? I googled it and asked the developers, but got no answer...

    I got some result:
    Here the contig is assembled by two groups of reads, left side are reverse reads, while right side is forward. (for visualization, i have reverse complement the right mate)

    But some of the contigs are assembled purely from reverse or forward reads. If it is strand specific, one gene should produce the reads in the same direction. It should not report the result like the image above, am I right? Or is it possible that one gene is fragmented and then sequence independently, so that happenly left part produce reverse reads while right part produce forward reads? From my understanding, the strand specificity is kept by 3'/5' ligation, so should be in the unit of genes.

    What is the problem here? Or did I understand the concept of 'strand specific' wrongly? Any help is appreciated.
  • maubp
    Peter (Biopython etc)
    • Jul 2009
    • 1544

    #2
    Are these Illumina paired reads? You would expect those to come in a forward/reverse pair (even if the RNA was strand specific).

    Comment

    • CarlElit
      Member
      • Nov 2009
      • 14

      #3
      Thans, maubp.

      Yes, they are Illumila. When assemblying, I passed them in as FR format. I just double checked with that.

      I reverse complement the right mates and aligned back to the contigs. Such that I have a better idea about their directions.

      I have got some contigs assembled all by forward (or reverse) reads. Meanwhile, I got some contigs shown as the image above. So I asked here.

      Comment

      • maubp
        Peter (Biopython etc)
        • Jul 2009
        • 1544

        #4
        Is that image typical, or an odd case? Are most of your 'genes' supported by strand specific reads (after the processing you described).

        Perhaps the gene shown is a miss-assembly, and is really two genes on opposite strand which have been joined at the 3' end. If so, you may be able to check that with BLAST or domain searches.

        Comment

        • CarlElit
          Member
          • Nov 2009
          • 14

          #5
          So they may be from different genes? Just wrongly joined together? I would check it. Thanks.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
            by SEQadmin2



            CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

            Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
            ...
            07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
          0 responses
          14 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
          0 responses
          31 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
          0 responses
          40 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
          0 responses
          26 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...