Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CarlElit
    Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 14

    #1

    Strand specific tophat/cufflinks

    Dear all,

    I have a strand-specific RNA-seq library to assemble (Illumina). I would like to use TopHat/Cufflinks. From the manual of TopHat, it says,

    "--library-type TopHat will treat the reads as strand specific. Every read alignment will have an XS attribute tag. Consider supplying library type options below to select the correct RNA-seq protocol."

    Does it mean that TopHat only supports strand-specific protocols? I use option "--library-type fr-unstranded" to run, does it mean it runs in a strand-specific way? I googled it and asked the developers, but got no answer...

    I got some result:
    Here the contig is assembled by two groups of reads, left side are reverse reads, while right side is forward. (for visualization, i have reverse complement the right mate)

    But some of the contigs are assembled purely from reverse or forward reads. If it is strand specific, one gene should produce the reads in the same direction. It should not report the result like the image above, am I right? Or is it possible that one gene is fragmented and then sequence independently, so that happenly left part produce reverse reads while right part produce forward reads? From my understanding, the strand specificity is kept by 3'/5' ligation, so should be in the unit of genes.

    What is the problem here? Or did I understand the concept of 'strand specific' wrongly? Any help is appreciated.
  • maubp
    Peter (Biopython etc)
    • Jul 2009
    • 1544

    #2
    Are these Illumina paired reads? You would expect those to come in a forward/reverse pair (even if the RNA was strand specific).

    Comment

    • CarlElit
      Member
      • Nov 2009
      • 14

      #3
      Thans, maubp.

      Yes, they are Illumila. When assemblying, I passed them in as FR format. I just double checked with that.

      I reverse complement the right mates and aligned back to the contigs. Such that I have a better idea about their directions.

      I have got some contigs assembled all by forward (or reverse) reads. Meanwhile, I got some contigs shown as the image above. So I asked here.

      Comment

      • maubp
        Peter (Biopython etc)
        • Jul 2009
        • 1544

        #4
        Is that image typical, or an odd case? Are most of your 'genes' supported by strand specific reads (after the processing you described).

        Perhaps the gene shown is a miss-assembly, and is really two genes on opposite strand which have been joined at the 3' end. If so, you may be able to check that with BLAST or domain searches.

        Comment

        • CarlElit
          Member
          • Nov 2009
          • 14

          #5
          So they may be from different genes? Just wrongly joined together? I would check it. Thanks.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          19 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          36 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          42 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...