Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • xhuister
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 41

    #1

    Many ### in fastq file (@HWI-ST...)?

    Hi all,

    I got some sequencing files in fastq format, like this:

    @HWI-ST741:189:C0GU5ACXX:8:1101:1219:1953 1:N:0:
    GTGAGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTAAATTCAATAAAGAAAATTTAGTTAAAAACACAAATACAGATGAGTATGTCT
    +
    ?@@?DDFFFFFIIIIIIIFD#####################################################
    @HWI-ST741:189:C0GU5ACXX:8:1101:1156:1999 1:N:0:
    TGGAGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTAGACGGAAAGAGGGTTACAGAAGAAACACCGACACACATCGCATATGGC
    +
    @+=DDDDDHHHHHIIIIIIIHC#####################################################

    This format is "Phred+33" fastq quality format, right? I checked this from WIKI (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FASTQ_format).

    What I confused is there are many reads (~50%) with many low quality scores ######... (score=35, which means a very low score 35-33=2).

    Is this possible? Or is this the sequencing problem?

    Thank you!

    Wu
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    You are interpreting that correctly. Those are reads whose quality drops to zilch after the first 20 or so bases. 2 is really as low as it goes. A 1 would technically means that you only have a 1 in 10 chance of the base being accurate, but obviously with only 4 nucleotides, the odds can't be that poor, hence, the quality is 2, represented by a # in phred +33

    If most of the reads look like that, talk to whomever ran the instrument, because something bad happened during the run.

    Comment

    • xhuister
      Member
      • Apr 2010
      • 41

      #3
      Originally posted by swbarnes2 View Post
      You are interpreting that correctly. Those are reads whose quality drops to zilch after the first 20 or so bases. 2 is really as low as it goes. A 1 would technically means that you only have a 1 in 10 chance of the base being accurate, but obviously with only 4 nucleotides, the odds can't be that poor, hence, the quality is 2, represented by a # in phred +33

      If most of the reads look like that, talk to whomever ran the instrument, because something bad happened during the run.
      Thank you very much, swbarnes2. I've asked the guy who sequenced these samples, but he never replies. So I posted it here for help. Now I'm sure this is the problem, I'll check this with the sequencing people.

      Comment

      • maubp
        Peter (Biopython etc)
        • Jul 2009
        • 1544

        #4
        See this recent thread, http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20709

        The run of ##### at the end of a read's quality string (PHRED quality 2) means Illumina's software thinks there is a problem here. This is know as the "Read Segment Quality Control Indicator". Under the old Illumina FASTQ encoding Q2 was a 'B'.

        Comment

        • xhuister
          Member
          • Apr 2010
          • 41

          #5
          Thanks maubp. It is really the sequencing problem.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          17 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          36 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          42 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...