Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Admiralenola
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 3

    #1

    Velvet paired reads not working properly

    Dear all,

    I'm having a problem doing de novo assembly of paired reads in Velvet. (I am working on a bacterial, single chromosome genome.) The contigs assembled are extremely short, having an n50 of just 25, max 272! If I only use one of the fastq files (in other words, not using paired reads), I get contigs with an n50 of around 20.000.

    Naturally, I'm assuming that either I'm doing some of the input wrong, or my reads are not really what I think they are.

    I have 100nt reads from a HiSeq 2000 machine. The reads come in two different fastq files. I have already used the reads for SNP analysis by aligning them against a reference genome, and that works nicely. (I did that in MAQ.)

    I've remembered to flag my reads as shortPaired when running velveth, and I've used shuffleSequences_fastq.pl to shuffle the reads. I've tried with a variety of insert sizes. (Alignments to reference suggests the insret is around 200) I've tried to reverse complement zero, one and both of the read files. (We've had radio silence from our sequencing centre, so unfortunately I don't really know how they prepared the data)

    My sequence data seems properly sorted; Here are the first reads from each file:

    @HWI-ST790:2:1101:1481:2166#TAGCTT/1
    ATGAGGCTGGAATGCCTTCAAAGCGACTTCGCTGCGGATTCTCCAGCGCCTTGGCCTGGTTCCACTTCGTGATGATTTCATCGATGGATGCCGGAAAATG
    +HWI-ST790:2:1101:1481:2166#TAGCTT/1
    aaaece`cgggggiiiiihiiiiiiiihiiiiiihiifhhaggihiiigggebeeddccdcccdccccccccccd_acbcdbcc`]_ccbcccccXacbb

    @HWI-ST790:2:1101:1481:2166#TAGCTT/2
    ATCAGGCCAGTTTGTCATCGATGATGTGGTGCGCGGCCTCACCGAAAAAATGACGCGGCGTAATGCGCATGTTTTCAAGCCGGATGGGAGTTTGCAGGAG
    +HWI-ST790:2:1101:1481:2166#TAGCTT/2
    _b_eeeeegggggiiiiiiihhiiihiihiiiiiihiiiihihihiigfeddddcccccccccccccccccccccccccccccaacccbc^bbccdcccc

    My questions are:
    1. Is this a known problem?
    2. Is there a tool that takes in a set of your reads and tells you what they are? (Orientation, insert size, etc)

    Thanks in advance!
  • ians
    Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 53

    #2
    I suspect you are feeding velvet the reads properly; Velvet expects that pairs be in the same file and in forward-reverse order. It's a good idea to read the velvet manual:

    4.1 Input sequence les
    Velvet works mainly with fasta and fastq formats.
    For paired-end reads, the assumption is that each read is next to its mate
    read. In other words, if the reads are indexed from 0, then reads 0 and 1 are
    paired, 2 and 3, 4 and 5, etc.
    If for some reason you have forward and reverse reads in two dierent FASTA
    les but in corresponding order, the bundled Perl script shueSequences fasta.pl
    will merge the two les into one as appropriate. To use it, type:
    > ./shuffleSequences_fasta.pl forward_reads.fa reverse_reads.fa output.fa
    There is also a shueSequences fastq.pl script for Sanger-style FastQ les.
    Concerning read orientation, Velvet expects paired-end reads to come from
    opposite strands facing each other, as in the traditional Sanger format. If you
    have paired-end reads produced from circularisation (i.e. from the same strand),
    it will be necessary to replace the rst read in each pair by its reverse complement
    before running velveth.
    Last edited by ians; 07-09-2012, 08:26 AM.

    Comment

    • Admiralenola
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 3

      #3
      Sorry if I did not make this clear in the original post, but I have done exactly that. So, after using the shuffleSequences_fastq.pl script, reads are lined up next to their "mate". For example, the first two reads in this resultant, shuffled file are:

      @HWI-ST790:2:1101:1481:2166#TAGCTT/1
      @HWI-ST790:2:1101:1481:2166#TAGCTT/2

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2




        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
        Today, 06:46 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
      0 responses
      15 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      68 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      48 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...