Why can't we use with genome assemblers for assembly of cDNA?
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
You can use genome-base assemblers for cDNA assembly. However, rather obviously, cDNA is different looking than a genome (e.g., size; composition) and the depth-of-coverage of the sequencing is often different as well. Thus using an assembly program 'tuned' to detect cDNA is better than using a genomic assembly program.
The above is rather generic. Undoubtedly someone somewhere has written a in-depth article about the differences. However if you can answer "what is the difference between cDNA and genomic DNA" then you should have a rough idea of why assembly on one is not the same as the assembly of the other.
-
Thanks for asking the question, geschickten.
I have indeed done this, but not for any published analysis. I don't know of any reason why most assemblers would not do just as well on transcriptome assembly as genome assembly. It seems that in some ways, the source sequence has reduced complexity (no non-coding, highly repetetive sequence), but may still have a lot of difficult complexity (similar domains, splice variants, gene families).
But really I'm just handwaving. ... I'd love to hear from someone who's done some real benchmarking on this issue.
Comment
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).
Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into...-
Channel: Articles
07-31-2026, 11:01 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:32 AM
|
0 responses
8 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Today, 10:32 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-20-2026, 11:17 AM
|
0 responses
28 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-20-2026, 11:17 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-18-2026, 10:05 AM
|
0 responses
31 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-18-2026, 10:05 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
|
0 responses
45 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
|
Comment