Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ccard28
    Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 20

    Galaxy Cuffdiff Values

    Hello All,
    I am using Galaxy to run Tophat/Cufflinks/Cuffdiff but am running in to some trouble with cufflinks and cuffdiff. I am getting different FPKM values on my cufflinks output of 2 samples when compared to the 2 values that cuffdiff is using from the same two tophat alignments. I have seen a thread on this before but no definitive solution was come to other than maybe the version of cufflinks being used. Galaxy says Cufflinks(version 0.0.5) which compared to the previous thread about this topic seems to be a very old version (if this is a comparable label to cufflinks versions in general and not a galaxy specific label of some sort). Would this presumably be the cause of my differing FPKM values for cufflinks and cuffdiff? Are there any other possibilities? Should I look at working with these analyses in command line based approaches instead of galaxy to solve my problem? I am not very familiar with command line so I was hoping to get this problem solved through galaxy if that is at all possible. If anyone has any suggestions they would be much appreciated. Thank you in advance for any responses.
  • ccard28
    Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 20

    #2
    Correction, the version of cufflinks and cuffdiff being used is 1.3.0 for both. Previous posts have stayed going to this version have solved problems for people getting different values from cuffdiff and cufflinks but I am still getting different values from the two outputs. Are there any other possible explanations for cufflinks and cuffdiff showing different FPKM values from the two samples?

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
      by SEQadmin2


      Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


      The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
      ...
      06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    25 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
    0 responses
    42 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
    0 responses
    48 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
    0 responses
    49 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...