Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mht
    Member
    • May 2012
    • 23

    #1

    Cutoffs for TPM values

    Hi,

    I'm using RSEM to compute gene expression values for two different RNA-seq sample. RSEM outputs tau value which I then converted to TPM value by multiplying it by 10^6.

    1) Is there a minimum cutoff value I should set for TPM value? I see some papers filter out genes with TPM < 1 or TPM < 5 before proceeding to further analysis. How do I determine what cutoff should be used?

    2) In a set of gene expression results, is it possible to determine which genes are considered highly expressed and which are expressed at low levels? I've see some papers use 1 < TPM < 9 as low and TPM >=100 as moderate/highly expressed, while others use percentiles (e.g. >= 75% percentile as highly expressed).

    Thanks in advance.
  • CPCantalapiedra
    Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 38

    #2
    We seem to have the same issue than several years ago.
    We have a set of RSEM files from different samples and our results from EdgeR point out that we have a lot of noise since we have not filtered out the transcripts based depth of coverage or counts (TPMs, ...).

    We have seen that, in our data, a TPM of about 1 use to have around 3x DoC. However, we are not sure how to establish a cutoff or if it is enough by obtaining such relationship and choose the DoC we are confident with.

    In addition, we have the question whether we should reanalyze edgeR results after filtering RSEM files, or if "translating" the filtering to the edgeR results would suffice.

    Any hint?

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • kinpict.com
      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by kinpict.com
      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
      Today, 06:37 PM
    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    2 responses
    55 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post kinpict.com  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    175 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...