Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • edge
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 199

    Input file format for RSEM

    Hi,

    Currently I'm focus on expression profiling of transcriptome study.
    As I know, RSEM calculation is based on raw read map back to assembled contig.
    My main concern is that whether is advisable that my raw read is in proper pair form and complete length (eg. all same length 100 nt and present in pair form)?
    Since it is always a good practice to pre-process the data-set (eg. trim adaptor sequence and low quality bases) before running through de-novo assembly.

    Unfortunately, trim adaptor might cause the raw data in different read length and remove low quality read will cause that those so-called "high quality" read is not in proper pair form (some will only keep left read and some will only keep right read).

    Thus I just not sure whether the best practice is I just keep those high quality read in proper pair form and complete length for running de-novo assembly and RSEM.
    Since shorter read length (due to trim adaptor sequence) is more easier to map back to contig.
    I just scare the biased of data mapping cause the expression result inaccurate.

    Thanks for any advice sharing regarding RSEM program utilization.
  • edge
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 199

    #2
    I got two sets of Illumina pair-end transcriptome data (both set are closely-related plant species). First, I will trim adaptor sequence and low quality bases of both data set separately before de-novo assembly separately.
    I got two sets of assembly contigs and two sets of Illumina pair-end data right now.
    My main objective of research is to identify the gene profiling of two closely-related plant .
    I will use RSEM output file as an input file for EBSeq (as mentioned by RSEM) in order to run differential expression.

    Thanks for any advice.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    21 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...