Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • liuxq
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 36

    different fpkm values for one sample in cuffdiff isoform_exp.diff output

    i have three samples R1, R2 and R3, and i use cuffdiff to do differential expression analysis.

    for a specific gene, its fpkm value for one sample has two value records, because each sample will be compare to other two samples respectively.


    i find that in the isoform_exp.diff file, for one specific gene uc009ywh.3, the two fpkm values are inconsistent for one sample R2. when compared with R1 the fpkm value for uc009ywh.3 is 0, however, when compared with R3, the fpkm value is 21.6051.

    how to explain the inconsistency?
  • rboettcher
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 71

    #2
    Could you state which version of cufflinks etc. you are using and how your command looks like?

    Comment

    • liuxq
      Member
      • Jun 2010
      • 36

      #3
      Originally posted by rboettcher View Post
      Could you state which version of cufflinks etc. you are using and how your command looks like?
      version of cufflinks is 2.0.2
      the command is as follows
      cuffdiff -o diff_out.ucsc -b hg19.fa -L R1,R2,R3 -u ./UCSC.hg19.gtf R1.bam R2.bam R3.bam

      actually speaking, i have traced cufflinks for several versions. the problem exists all along

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        Today, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      5 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      30 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...