Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mrfox
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 103

    #1

    varscan2: filters

    Hi all and hopefully Dan,

    I am still not very sure about how to use the Varscan2 filters for SNVs and Indels obtained. Below are my questions, any advice on the clarification of using the filters will be appreciated.

    1) For a single sample,

    Step 1. Use pileup2snp and pileup2indel call SNVs and Indels.

    Step2. Run varscan2 filter on SNVs using the Indels as an input. Then filter indels using java -jar varscan2 filter output.indel >filtered.indel.

    Aternatively,
    Step2. Another option is to filter indel first and use the filtered indels as input to filter SNVs.

    Which one is better for step 2?

    2) For a Normal/Tumor sample,
    From the context of the Varscan2 instruction, the "somaticFilter" is designed only for filtering SNVs, not for indels. So there is actually no filter for Indels. The Indel file obtained from calling Varscan2 somatic will be the final reported Indel. Is that correct? Is somaticFilter applicable to Indels?

    Of course, we can change any somatic indel with read2>0 into Germline.

    Thank you all!
  • dkoboldt
    Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 62

    #2
    Hao,

    Thank you for the question. First of all, I would use *unfiltered* indels to filter SNPs (as long as your variant calling criteria are reasonable), because your goal is to remove variants that are due to alignment issues, and even unfiltered indel calls are a guide to these. But use your judgment: if the unfiltered indels remove a significant portion of dbSNPs, then there's a problem.

    The somaticFilter works on somatic indel as well as SNV files from VarScan somatic. I do recommend that you use it, but you're correct to think of applying your own filters to those (especially to catch germline variants). Any time we see "somatic" indels with evidence in the normal sample, or that match dbSNP variants, we remove them.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
      by SEQadmin2



      Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

      Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
      ...
      10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    13 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    32 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    0 responses
    45 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    170 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...