Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • newBioinfo
    Member
    • Mar 2012
    • 36

    #1

    Fastqc:how to get a quality score for individual read

    Hi Everyone,
    I have a 77 million reads and I need to know the quality score of each read so that I can filter the data based on the quality score. I used Fastqc and it gives me the graph of quality score of each read. But I need to know in a file how much is the quality score of each read. Is there any way I can get that.
    Please help!!!
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    Originally posted by newBioinfo View Post
    Hi Everyone,
    I have a 77 million reads and I need to know the quality score of each read so that I can filter the data based on the quality score. I used Fastqc and it gives me the graph of quality score of each read. But I need to know in a file how much is the quality score of each read. Is there any way I can get that.
    Please help!!!
    I'm pretty sure there is no single value for that. Individual bases have quality scores, a read can have a mapping score, which is entirely dependent on the reference you give it, but I don't know of a single quality score for an Illumina read. You could get all the reads with 80% of the bases >Q30, or trim all the 3' bases with <Q5, or somethinig like that.

    Comment

    • mnkyboy
      Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 87

      #3
      You can use fastx to filter based on your desired quality score.

      Comment

      • billstevens
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2012
        • 120

        #4
        Sorry, very basic, very quick question. I have very good 100bp PE data (Illumina Phred Scores ~33). That usually holds all the way through from base 1 to 100. However, there are some reads that are low quality, and sometimes, at the 3' end of some reads, the quality dips very low, but not often.

        Since the quality doesn't dip often at any end, I think trimming is a bad idea, but I still should filter reads based on a certain quality score, right??

        Comment

        • billstevens
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2012
          • 120

          #5
          bump? Sorry for the simple question. I wasn't filtering, but I went to a workshop that said you should always filter/trim, and I just wanted to have one more confirmation.

          Comment

          • billstevens
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2012
            • 120

            #6
            Also, sorry, does anyone know how to filter more than one file at a time with Fastq?

            Comment

            • fubar
              Crusty old bioinformatician
              • Oct 2010
              • 8

              #7
              Originally posted by billstevens View Post
              Also, sorry, does anyone know how to filter more than one file at a time with Fastq?
              Yes is the answer to your question as quoted above.
              You might have meant to ask how: I usually filter one or more fastq files using the fastx toolkit wrappers in our local Galaxy which fires off jobs to SGE so I can do 'more than one file at a time' - but YMMV as it always does with these things.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                by SEQadmin2




                NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
                Yesterday, 06:46 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
              0 responses
              29 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
              0 responses
              20 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              71 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              48 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...