Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • yub
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 5

    what does "replicates" mean in CuffDiff

    I am new to RNA-seq and want to find out how to use CuffDiff correctly:

    I am trying to compare two groups or conditions (A vs B), with 5 samples in each group. Each sample is from a different individual.

    After using Tophat-->Cufflinks for each sample-->CuffMerge, I tried to use CuffDiff to find differentially expressed genes between the two groups. When I input the 5 samples in each group as 5 replicates, CuffDiff generated an output where almost all tests were "FAIL". When I input each sample as a group without replicate, CuffDiff kept running without generating any result.

    Thanks for letting me know what "replicates" mean in CUffDiff and if there is any solution to my problems!
  • mbblack
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 245

    #2
    If you entered them as two comma separated lists (with a space between the comma separated input files for the two groups):

    e.g. Group1_1.bam,Group1_2.bam,Group1_3.bam,Group1_4.bam,Group1_5.bam Group2_1.bam,Group2_2.bam,Group2_3.bam,Group2_4.bam,Group2_5.bam

    Then they would be treated properly as biological replicates.

    My understanding of the "FAIL" error is that it means the isoform abundance computation failed due to an actual numeric error (missing values can cause it for one, but there are other conditions that will cause it - search the board for related posts as there are discussions on that error in the past).
    Michael Black, Ph.D.
    ScitoVation LLC. RTP, N.C.

    Comment

    • yub
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2012
      • 5

      #3
      Thank you very much, Dr. Black.

      So one replicate just means one individual sample, therefore different replicates can be from different individuals, not necessarily from replications of the same individual. Is this correct?

      How can I find out the variance or standard deviation in each group? CuffDiff output I got only had the mean of each group and p-value. Thank you!

      Comment

      • mbblack
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 245

        #4
        If you are talking about an experiment that used multiple individual subjects or animals, then yes, each individual would be a sample and each sample in each treatment group would be a biological replicate. Biological replicates sample the variation within a population.

        A replicate taken from the same individual would be a form of technical replicate, which would tell you nothing about the biological variation within the population.

        I'm not sure where you can actually get SD values. Check the cuffdiff manual and maybe see what is in the various FPKM tracking files - they may have what you need to compute it yourself. I have not used cuffdiff in awhile, so I don't remember the exact file contents of all the output files.
        Michael Black, Ph.D.
        ScitoVation LLC. RTP, N.C.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        43 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        48 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        49 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...