Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • xApple
    Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 12

    Cleaning second-generation sequencing data - current situation

    Hello everyone,

    What was first to be a question on seqanswers or biostars, turned into a long post as I was writting it, so I ended up loading it on a blog. But it's not less of topic I would like to see discussed here or else where. I would be grateful if you felt like sharing your thoughts about the pre-processing of reads. Here is the link to my short review:

    Cleaning second-generation sequencing data
  • yaximik
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 199

    #2
    Thanks for making this review. I am scouring the net for such set of tools/software myself. I noticed though that you focused on 454 reads, I guess because of your data set, is that correct? I have a mix of Illumina/454 reads, so my only option is using fastq format as input. I would also appreciate to hear opinion/advice on that from more seasoned members.

    Comment

    • xApple
      Member
      • Feb 2012
      • 12

      #3
      Yes, that is correct, my data is exclusively 454. But that will probably soon change. It's a pity that this thread did not take up. The last post on cleaning data generated 25 replies.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...