Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • neophte
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2012
    • 3

    Mac Osx 10.8 and Samtools problems

    Hi

    I am a newbie to bioinformatics!

    I having problems running samtools from my terminal using mac osx v10.8 on my pro. I've downloaded and unpacked v 0.1.18 - in terminal I entered "make" on the command line where my samtools directory is and it seemed to be successful bc I could see the executable. When I attempt to enter it again on the command line along with my option, bash tells me that the command is not found. I aslo tried entering ./samtools instead of samtools and I recieved a "no such file or directory"

    How can I fix this problem?

    Thanks
  • rbagnall
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 34

    #2
    Most likely it has not been added to your perl path (which means that perl cannot find the samtools application). To test this, open terminal and type:

    which samtools

    and this should display the path to the installation of samtools; e.g.

    /Users/richardb/Richard/MY_PROJECTS/NGS/Applications/Samtools-0.1.8/samtools

    if not, then you need to add samtools to your path.

    Comment

    • maubp
      Peter (Biopython etc)
      • Jul 2009
      • 1544

      #3
      Putting the binary on your $PATH is the easiest solution. Personally I edit my bash profile to add the directory $HOME/bin, in your case something like /Users/neophte/bin, and then move or copy the samtools binary (and other tools) to this /Users/neophte/bin/ directory.

      Or, always call samtools with a full path, e.g.

      /Users/neophte/downloads/samtools-0.1.18/samtools view ...

      Note that when you do ./samtools the dot is Unix shorthand for the current directory.

      Comment

      • neophte
        Junior Member
        • Nov 2012
        • 3

        #4
        thanks all for your suggestions - it worked!

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        55 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...