Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tahamasoodi
    Success
    • May 2012
    • 130

    Very bad QC report

    Hi,

    I have a few whole genome samples with a very poor QC report as shown in the figures. Can I go for their further analysis or just discard them?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	per_base_quality.png
Views:	1
Size:	10.0 KB
ID:	307951

    Click image for larger version

Name:	duplication_levels.png
Views:	1
Size:	16.5 KB
ID:	307952

    Click image for larger version

Name:	per_base_n_content.png
Views:	1
Size:	12.0 KB
ID:	307953

    Click image for larger version

Name:	per_base_sequence_content.png
Views:	1
Size:	16.7 KB
ID:	307954

    Click image for larger version

Name:	per_sequence_quality.png
Views:	1
Size:	16.6 KB
ID:	307955
    Thanks,
  • DunderChief
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2012
    • 6

    #2
    You have a ton of sequences with <3 for average quality. Remove these sequences, and re-run the fastQC. You may have enough sequences to salvage something.

    Comment

    • tahamasoodi
      Success
      • May 2012
      • 130

      #3
      Thanks, which tool shall i use to remove these sequences?
      Thanks,

      Comment

      • westerman
        Rick Westerman
        • Jun 2008
        • 1104

        #4
        If paired end then use Trimmomatic. For single end you can get by with fastq_quality_trimmer. The latter is easier to set up. The latter can also be used with paired-end but this requires a lot more setup than Trimmomatic.

        Comment

        • westerman
          Rick Westerman
          • Jun 2008
          • 1104

          #5
          As a first pass, even if you have paired-end, you could treat the sample as single end thus running fastq_quality_trimmer just to see how many reads you end up with.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          54 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...