Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kennels
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 149

    #1

    Trimming 5' end of RNAseq reads for de novo assembly

    Hi,

    I know this has been discussed previously (http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthr...ptome+assembly) , but I'm wondering if anyone can share their experiences on de novo transcriptome assembly with trimming and not trimming the 5' end due to the 'random' priming bias of illumina RNAseq reads. How much could this affect the assembly really?

    Can anyone point to a paper that studied this?

    I've always trimmed, but doing some recent updated searching, I'm almost seeing an equal proportion of both methods.

    Thanks
    Last edited by Kennels; 11-14-2012, 05:47 PM.
  • Kennels
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 149

    #2
    anyone have any advice/comments?

    Comment

    • Kennels
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 149

      #3
      Sorry for the persistence, but I really don't have anyone here to ask for advice on this...
      surely someone must have some experience or comments on this? thanks

      Comment

      • shoegame2001
        Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 21

        #4
        I have also heard this step suggested, but to me it does not make much sense. Maybe I am misunderstanding, but I don't see how trimming eliminates the priming bias. These are not sequencing errors, but a biased set of true transcripts. Trimming still leaves you with shorter reads from those real, but biased set of transcripts. Anyone with more experience, feel free to correct me.

        Comment

        • schlesin
          Junior Member
          • Aug 2010
          • 3

          #5
          In some RNA-seq protocols the error rate of the first few bases is higher, due to mispriming of the random primers. See e.g. Fig. 1 in http://genome.cshlp.org/content/21/9/1543.full

          If that is the case, removing those bases might help.

          Comment

          • Kennels
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2011
            • 149

            #6
            thanks very much for the replies.

            I do agree that removing the biased bases do not really remove the 'biased' reads as these have already been selected for during the sample prep.

            I guess my concern is that the reduced complexity in the first 15 bases will affect the assembly process, as many assemblers use distinct kmer sizes from the reads during stages of the assembly. At least that was my understanding.. but then I recently read many papers not doing this trimming, hence my query ...

            Comment

            • Andres_Ribone
              Junior Member
              • Apr 2017
              • 3

              #7
              Hi, did anyone see a paper about how trimming (or not) these bases affects assembly? Particularly de novo assembly?

              Thanks

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                Yesterday, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              8 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              17 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
              0 responses
              15 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
              0 responses
              27 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...