From Tophat output "junctions.bed", we could know the position of junctions. I think this junction should be intron. But after I assembled tophat output by Cufflinks, I found that the position of intron is different from that of intron.
-
-
A couple of possibilities:
Have you done QC filtering using something like FASTX toolkit? Or maybe, it's just optional exons, or an alternative splice site. Have you looked at the DNA sequence to see if it has possible splice acceptor/donor sites? -
I mean, if junction area is intron area, tophat output and Cufflinks output should be consistent. But when I checked a gene, the intron area implied by Tophat and Cufflinks are different. Then I noticed that many genes have this problem.Originally posted by scottyler89 View PostComment
-
It might be worth double checking that the GTF file your using matches the bowtie alignment index. It's possible if they are from different builds of the same genome, the indexes for the alignments wouldn't match up with the expected intron/exon junctions.Comment
-
Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?
Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating...10-14-2026, 09:55 AM -
Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.
We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing...
Comment