I came across a simple one line command allowing take files in a folder one by one and pipe them into another command, but I cannot find this thread. Can someone help? Say, decompress hundreds of gziped files in a folder after downloading a database, or pipe to another process.
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
Let's see if this puts you in the right direction...Originally posted by yaximik View PostI came across a simple one line command allowing take files in a folder one by one and pipe them into another command, but I cannot find this thread. Can someone help? Say, decompress hundreds of gziped files in a folder after downloading a database, or pipe to another process.
To uncompress all the gzip files in the current directory this may suffice:
To do something with each gzipped file, e.g. print out the first 15 lines and write them to a file:Code:gunzip *.gz ## Use gunzip -r to descent in subdirectories
DarioCode:for gz in `find mydir/ -name '*.gz'` do gunzip -c $gz | head -n 15 > ${gz}.head done
-
-
This should do it: http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/bash-loop-over-file/
There will be analogous commands for tcsh, if that is your favorite.
Comment
-
-
Yep.Originally posted by dariober View PostTo uncompress all the gzip files in the current directory this may suffice:
To do something with each gzipped file, e.g. print out the first 15 lines and write them to a file:Code:gunzip *.gz ## Use gunzip -r to descent in subdirectories
DarioCode:for gz in `find mydir/ -name '*.gz'` do gunzip -c $gz | head -n 15 > ${gz}.head done
And to get the results in the same file, you can do
Code:for gz in *.gz ; do less $gz | head -15 ; done > outfile
Comment
-
-
Thanks everyone. I realized I did not express the question clearly. Gzip is just one of applications, i rather asked about general looping over files:
The beauty of what I saw was that it fit just in one line and was pretty general, so it can be applied to other commands that do not take '*' for multiple files.Code:while/for/if [I]something is in the folder[/I] do [I]something to each file[/I] until [I]all are processed[/I] done
Comment
-
-
In fact, you can also do for loop one-liners with ";" or even with & to fork them to background
For example looping over Fasta files (*.fa) and counting the headers (i.e. number of sequences) could be done on one line like so:
If you want to parallel unzip a bunch of files you could fork the loop like so:Code:for f in *.fa; do grep -c ">"; done
This runs all gunzip calls in parallel and 'wait's for them to be finished (optional)Code:for f in *.gz; do gunzip ${f} & done; wait
I learned the hard way: While those one-liners are nice and quick for scripting on a terminal, never use them in longer bash-scripts because a) you will at some point have a typo and then will have a very hard time finding it and b) there is essentially no need in saving space/shortening out commands in a bash script.
Best
Simon
Comment
-
-
Thanks a lot, everyone who provided inputs. That was very educational in general as I get a better idea how I can use simple loops. I wonder, would it be useful to have something like WiKiBits (or a better name) as a collection of little ingenious solutions?
Comment
-
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by GATTACATLove this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
-
Channel: Articles
07-01-2026, 11:43 AM -
-
by SEQadmin2
I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.
Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...-
Channel: Articles
-
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:05 AM
|
0 responses
6 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Today, 11:05 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
|
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
|
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
|
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
|
Comment