Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ajthomas
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 167

    assemble resequencing data to multiple references

    I have some targeted genomic resequencing data I'm trying to assemble. The genomic region is highly variable, and I have reference sequences from 8 different haplotypes I can use. The 8 haplotypes differ considerably from one another. So far, I've only been able to assemble the data to one of the references at a time, but I would like to find a tool that would allow me to use all 8 concurrently and assembly contigs based on best match.

    Does anyone know of an alignment tool that can use multiple reference sequences of the same genomic region simultaneously? Or, can anyone suggest a better approach to analyzing this data?
  • jimmybee
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 119

    #2
    Are you doing a de-novo assembly of the data? Or reference-based assembly?

    Comment

    • ajthomas
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2010
      • 167

      #3
      Reference-based. As I said, I have reference sequences for 8 different haplotypes that differ significantly from one another. Rather than randomly picking 1 of the 8 to use as a reference, I would prefer to use all 8 to align as many reads as possible.

      Comment

      • xied75
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2012
        • 129

        #4
        How about join those 8 together as one reference?

        Comment

        • ajthomas
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2010
          • 167

          #5
          Wouldn't that just confuse the software? It would then have potentially as many as 8 sites to which it could align a given read, instead of just one. I think that would be comparable to just adding all 8 sequences individually as references because that would force the software to pick one of them to align each sequence to.

          I was thinking about just creating a consensus sequence from the 8 and using that for the reference, but I would like to keep the 8 sequences separate for comparison purposes later.

          Comment

          • xied75
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2012
            • 129

            #6
            Yes it'll confuse the aligner a lot! For the duplicate area, it will need to pick one from the 8. But for variable area, it will report the highest scored one.

            For what you want, I guess no aligner is designed for that purpose (my guess). Because instead of creating an aligner that can align to 8 ref at the same time, why not start 8 instance each targetting one ref? It was only lines of script away from you.

            Comment

            • jimmybee
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2010
              • 119

              #7
              Originally posted by ajthomas View Post
              Reference-based. As I said, I have reference sequences for 8 different haplotypes that differ significantly from one another. Rather than randomly picking 1 of the 8 to use as a reference, I would prefer to use all 8 to align as many reads as possible.
              How about assembling it de-novo, match your region of interest with BLAST and then align each haplotype using a multiple sequence aligner like CLUSTALW etc? This would remove any bias that the reference sequence would have on your reference-based assembly

              Comment

              • ajthomas
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2010
                • 167

                #8
                That's not a bad idea. I'll have to think about that some more to decide whether I could make that work. I could do the de novo assembly, then BLAST the resulting contigs against a local BLAST database of the reference sequences, then use that information to map those matches back to the original sequences. Better yet, I could map them back to an alignment of the 8.

                I've tried aligning these sequences to create a consensus, but haven't had any luck yet. They're about 5 megabases each, and attempting to align even two of them brings my computer to its knees. (HP Z800 with 2 6-core CPUs and 48 GB RAM) I'm looking into using the university's high performance computing cluster core next. I hope that can do it.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                  ...
                  07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                  There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                  07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:26 AM
                0 responses
                9 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
                0 responses
                24 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
                0 responses
                16 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                0 responses
                33 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...