Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • paolo.kunder
    Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 93

    MeDIP-seq data analysis

    Dear All,
    I followed the MEDUSA protocol to filter out both not properly paired, low quality mapping and non-unique sequences from my alignment files.

    For example one mC sample started with 100 milions reads. 80 % mapped, 70 % of them properly mapped with high quility (mapQ>40).
    The problem arises when I filter out for non-unique reads. Roughly 90 % are discarded leading to a final number of 3-5 milions of reads.
    All my mC samples behave in the same way.

    Maybe the DNA starting material was not properly quantified (2-3 ng instead of 5 ng were used for the generation of the libraries).
    We didn't observe the same problem for the Input DNA ( correctly quantified) and for 2 samples out of 4 for 5-hydroxy-mC.

    The high number of non-unique reads could be due to a technical problem or a biological problem? Have you ever experienced a similar problem?
    How do you think I should proceed with the analysis? Is it absolutely necessary to remove non-unique reads?

    Is the first time I deal with this kind of analysis I would like to undestand which is the best approach to follow.

    Thank you very much for your time,
    Paolo

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...