Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bye
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 8

    bowtie2, option -N

    We have SE 100bp reads aligned with bowtie2. We noticed that when keep other options the same, but change -N 0 to -N 1, we got some really different alignments, see example below:
    Code:
    bowtie2 -x ./hg19/hg19_all --end-to-end -D 20 -R 3 -N 0 -L 20 -i S,1,0.50 --score-min L,-1,-1 -c AGAGCTGTTCCTATTCGGCCATCTTGGCTCCTCCTCCCGGATTCACTGATTTTTTGAAGGGTTTTTTGTGTCTCTATCTCCTTCAGTTCTGCTCTGATCTT
    Output:
    Code:
    0       0       chr4    58434477        42      101M    *       0       0       AGAGCTGTTCCTATTCGGCCATCTTGGCTCCTCCTCCCGGATTCACTGATTTTTTGAAGGGTTTTTTGTGTCTCTATCTCCTTCAGTTCTGCTCTGATCTT  IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII  AS:i:-12        XN:i:0  XM:i:2  XO:i:0  XG:i:0  NM:i:2  MD:Z:0G72T27    YT:Z:UU
    Code:
    bowtie2 -x ./hg19/hg19_all --end-to-end -D 20 -R 3 -N 1 -L 20 -i S,1,0.50 --score-min L,-1,-1 -c AGAGCTGTTCCTATTCGGCCATCTTGGCTCCTCCTCCCGGATTCACTGATTTTTTGAAGGGTTTTTTGTGTCTCTATCTCCTTCAGTTCTGCTCTGATCTT
    Output:
    Code:
    0       16      chr2    136138378       0       60M5I1M1I34M    *       0       0       AAGATCAGAGCAGAACTGAAGGAGATAGAGACACAAAAAACCCTTCAAAAAATCAGTGAATCCGGGAGGAGGAGCCAAGATGGCCGAATAGGAACAGCTCT  IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII  AS:i:-88        XN:i:0  XM:i:10 XO:i:2  XG:i:6  NM:i:16 MD:Z:13C11C3A8C18T5C2T0T11A14C0
            YT:Z:UU
    I'm confused about the results. I thought -N 1 should be able to pick up the best alignment with -N 0, how come the alignment results are so much worse when -N 1 for the same read?

    Thanks in advance!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
    by SEQadmin2



    Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
    ...
    07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
    by SEQadmin2



    Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

    There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
    07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
0 responses
18 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
0 responses
30 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
0 responses
16 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
0 responses
34 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...