Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Apollo324
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2008
    • 1

    #1

    Maq and export format

    Maq is now being distributed with a tool to convert export format files to standard fastq, and I'm wondering if anyone knows how it treats the reads which failed the Illumina pipeline quality threshold test.

    Thanks.
  • myrna
    Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 44

    #2
    export2std for chastity filtered reads

    This function is implemented in the script fq_all2std.pl. I had assumed it would use all reads but later found out that it only took the read (pairs) that passed chastity filtering (there is a Y/N flag in the export file that marks this). You can comment out the line in fq_all2std.pl if you want to include the reads that failed this check:

    #if ($t[21] eq 'Y') {
    formatting code....
    print "+\n$qual\n";
    #}


    Ryan

    Comment

    • myrna
      Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 44

      #3
      export2maq

      In a similar vein, I have been hoping to hear from the Maq community whether anyone has had any success running the export2maq function. This is meant to take an export file and reformat it into a .map file (forgoing the need to run maq map or maq assemble). I always get a segmentation fault when I try to use this function (have tried on various platforms). I have gotten no response from the maq-help mailing list, so I thought I would try here.

      Thanks,
      Ryan

      Comment

      • bioinfosm
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2008
        • 483

        #4
        <bump>

        I get the same segmentation fault. I had another query, do I need to feed in both the export files for the mate pair (I would expect so).. regardless its a seg fault either ways
        --
        bioinfosm

        Comment

        • myrna
          Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 44

          #5
          I'm glad to see that someone out there is seeing the same issue. I have isolated the problem and made a simple workaround. The converter is expecting certain fields in the export file to be filled, but our pipeline leaves them empty. I pass the exports through a perl script that puts dummy fields in those columns before passing them to export2maq. Note, I pass in both the forward and reverse export files (e.g. cat export_*.txt | add_dummy_values.pl | maq export2maq out.map in.list -)

          Comment

          • bioinfosm
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2008
            • 483

            #6
            Originally posted by myrna View Post
            I'm glad to see that someone out there is seeing the same issue. I have isolated the problem and made a simple workaround. The converter is expecting certain fields in the export file to be filled, but our pipeline leaves them empty. I pass the exports through a perl script that puts dummy fields in those columns before passing them to export2maq. Note, I pass in both the forward and reverse export files (e.g. cat export_*.txt | add_dummy_values.pl | maq export2maq out.map in.list -)
            Thanks Ryan.
            I had also figured of different formatting for my export output, because of the way my reference sequence for eland was formatted.

            Anyways, I guess you are doing downstream analysis to detect structural variants, could you share how you proceed?

            I wish to use the maq sv script, but am not getting across the usage..
            --
            bioinfosm

            Comment

            • lh3
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2008
              • 686

              #7
              To bioinfosm:

              The input should be something like:

              maq mapview -b aln.map | awk '$6!=18&&$9>=10&&$6!=64&&$6!=192&&$6!=130' > sv.inp

              You can add more filters in the awk command to control the reads passed through maq.pl sv

              Comment

              • bioinfosm
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2008
                • 483

                #8
                Originally posted by lh3 View Post
                To bioinfosm:

                The input should be something like:

                maq mapview -b aln.map | awk '$6!=18&&$9>=10&&$6!=64&&$6!=192&&$6!=130' > sv.inp

                You can add more filters in the awk command to control the reads passed through maq.pl sv
                Hi Heng,
                I get nothing when using the above filters. Starangly, my 9th column (Quality ?) is 0! Any suggestion as to what might be going wrong there?

                and btw, happy new year!
                --
                bioinfosm

                Comment

                • lh3
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 686

                  #9
                  The 9th column is the smaller single-end mapping quality of the two reads in a pair. It is actually the mapping quality of an abnormal pair. You can reconstruct this column anyway.

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • SEQadmin2
                    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                    by SEQadmin2



                    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                    ...
                    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                    by SEQadmin2


                    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                    ...
                    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
                  0 responses
                  26 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
                  0 responses
                  20 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                  0 responses
                  36 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                  0 responses
                  43 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...