Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sdriscoll
    I like code
    • Sep 2009
    • 436

    #1

    gigaBayes (MarthLab) is running very slowly

    According to the documentation gigaBayes should run fairly quickly (18,000 30 bp reads per second) however on my system I'm seeing much slower performance (at least I'm interpreting it to be slow). With the --debug switch enabled I can watch the output and sometimes it spends 30 seconds or even several minutes at a single position resulting in total run time of more than 30 hours.

    I'm using illumina sequence data, single end reads, mouse organism and I've run the data through MosaikAligner, MosaikSort, and finally MosaikAssembler to produce a GIG file for gigaBayes. We're only interested in investigating chromosome 7 so I only aligned my source data to that chromosome (truncated reference file). Alignment and the other two programs tend to complete in about 1 hour total but then gigaBayes runs for up to 2 days straight before completing and I've caught it using up to 15 GB of RAM. My full gigaBayes command looks like this:

    gigaBayes --gig input.gig --gff output.gff --anchor --ploidy diploid --PSL 0.9 --debug

    My system specs:
    AMD Phenom 9950 Quad-core
    16 GB RAM
    Ubuntu 9.04 64 bit (2.6.28-15 kernel)

    does anyone have any idea what's going on?
    /* Shawn Driscoll, Gene Expression Laboratory, Pfaff
    Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA */
  • sdriscoll
    I like code
    • Sep 2009
    • 436

    #2
    Last night I tried running the above with a reduced region: 10,000,000 to 27,000,000. I ran that on 3 data files and each took about 1 hour to 1.5 hours to complete.

    Today I tried something different. My revised command line looks like this:

    gigaBayes --gig input.gig --gff output.gff --anchor --indel --ploidy diploid --sample "single" --debug

    Those same lanes took around 3 minutes to complete each. So it must have been the --sample option. By default gigaBayes uses "multiple" meaning that your same came from multiple specimens (?). I'm not sure how that works but it doesn't apply to my data which all comes from one source. That still doesn't answer the performance question though since that's a default value and by default it should be running very quickly. For my purposes, I'm happy now. But I don't understand why there was such a massive speed difference. Again if anyone has any insight it'd be cool to hear it. Thanks.
    /* Shawn Driscoll, Gene Expression Laboratory, Pfaff
    Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA */

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
      by SEQadmin2



      Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

      Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
      ...
      10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
      by SEQadmin2


      Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

      We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
      ...
      09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
    0 responses
    36 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
    0 responses
    42 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...