Tweet
If nseg is in your $PATH it should be ok. What happens if you just run
Do you get the help for trf printed to screen?
Code:
$ trf
-
-
Hello ,I was able to run this with all commands ,i did not compiled nseg properly...but I could run it then..
NOw, I have data from RepeatMAsker , the repeat library ,but it does not show any transpsosns in my genome...I ran it with RMBlast , do you think running with HMMER ,CROSS_MATCH would make a diff ?
also , any recommendations for transposon analysis ?Comment
-
help
Dear yzzhang
Have you resovled this problem? I came accross the same problem!
Originally posted by yzzhang View PostComment
-
If you exported the RepeatScout-1 directory to your $PATH, you don't need to write ./filename.prl, you just need to write filename.prl. If you include "./", it will search it in the current directory and maybe that is the problem (just guessing, I'm not a RepeatScout user, this looks more like a shell problem!)
Comment
-
Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
...07-09-2026, 11:10 AM -
Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.
There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...07-08-2026, 05:17 AM -
Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
Comment