Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aquleaf
    Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 38

    #1

    a Question about Duplicated Genes

    Hi all.

    I have a question about duplicated genes which have several copies in the genome such as Ccl21c. Tophat was used to map the RNA-Seq reads back to the genome and HTSeq was used to count the reads map to each gene. All of the reads stem from the duplicated genes will be get rid of by HTSeq because they are aligned to multiple places. Is there anyway to quantify these genes? Or could I mask the genomic regions of duplicated genes before running Tophat?

    Any suggestion will be much appreciated.

    Best
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    Don't mask the genome.

    The last thing you want is reads being forced to align to the wrong place, because you masked away the right place.

    If the genes are true duplicates, it's going to be pretty impossible to separate out what reads cam from where.

    Comment

    • aquleaf
      Member
      • Mar 2010
      • 38

      #3
      Thanks very much for your reply. We don't want to distinguish which locus these reads come from for a gene with several copies in the genome, we wish to count all the reads uniquely mapped to this gene. For example, if a gene has 4 copies in the genome, we want to count the number of reads mapped to those regions which were not mapped to other genes. Is there any way to achieve that?

      One more request, could anyone recommend a tool to modify GTF file used in the RNA-Seq analysis? We used the reference GTF file from UCSC and found lots of genes seem identical, such as Gm14430, Gm4724 and Gm14434. We wish to merge such genes into a single gene.

      Thanks a bunch!

      Best

      Originally posted by swbarnes2 View Post
      Don't mask the genome.

      The last thing you want is reads being forced to align to the wrong place, because you masked away the right place.

      If the genes are true duplicates, it's going to be pretty impossible to separate out what reads cam from where.

      Comment

      • JackieBadger
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 385

        #4
        http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.../2711.abstract

        Comment

        • liux
          Member
          • Mar 2009
          • 30

          #5
          We mask all but one copy if the duplicates are exactly the same (~50% of genes) or less than 1% (other 40%); and flag the rest.

          It is probably OK if just looking at the gene expression. recently we start to integrate ChIPseq data with mRNAseq data. I can see this approach will cause problems there.

          Comment

          • aquleaf
            Member
            • Mar 2010
            • 38

            #6
            Originally posted by liux View Post
            We mask all but one copy if the duplicates are exactly the same (~50% of genes) or less than 1% (other 40%); and flag the rest.

            It is probably OK if just looking at the gene expression. recently we start to integrate ChIPseq data with mRNAseq data. I can see this approach will cause problems there.
            Thanks very much for your reply. How do you mask them? Is there any software to mask them?

            We will also combine the ChIP-Seq data with mRNA-Seq data later on. What's the problem if the duplicates were masked?

            Thanks very much!

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • kinpict.com
              Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by kinpict.com
              The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
              Today, 06:37 PM
            • SEQadmin2
              16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by SEQadmin2





              NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
              10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
            0 responses
            35 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
            2 responses
            56 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post kinpict.com  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
            0 responses
            175 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...