Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hitesh
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 3

    #1

    Plant whole genome hybrid assembly

    Hi,

    We have generated data using Illumina HiSeq 2000 and 454 for a plant species.

    We completed the hybrid assembly using Velvet and got assembled contigs.

    Now we were trying to map the Illumina reads on the assembled contigs but only 25-30% of the reads are getting mapped.

    We were expecting more % mapping !!!!

    Does any one has any experience with this ?
  • jimmybee
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 119

    #2
    Are you using all assembled contigs to map against? Or did you only choose contigs greater than a certain size?

    Comment

    • Hitesh
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 3

      #3
      We used contigs greater than 300 bases...

      Comment

      • krobison
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2007
        • 734

        #4
        What length Illumina data do you have? What fold coverage given the expected genome size? What is the total contig length & N50 for your assembly?

        I would try assembling the Illumina data alone & see what you get. Also, try Ray as your assembler -- it tends to build longer contigs, and my experience to date is that the longer contigs are valid.

        Have you scanned different kmer values for velvet, either manually or using VelvetOptimiser?

        Comment

        • Hitesh
          Junior Member
          • Jul 2012
          • 3

          #5
          We have generated 45GB illumina data (100PE), 1 full plate 454 FLX and 1 plate 454 FLXplus for approx 700MB genome...we finally got ~400,000 contigs covering 630MB genome with N50 of 7.8KB...we did try different kmer lengths by manual calculations...the problem is that now when we try to map the illumina reads to the contigs ( ~ 400,000) to get heterozygous calls only 25-30% of the reads get mapped which we feel is a little strange !!! Is this expected ?

          Comment

          • jimmybee
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2010
            • 119

            #6
            A lot of your reads will map to your singletons (<300bp contigs) so you should try and include those in your analysis to see if the mapping improves. Is the genome repetitive? Have you had a look at the read coverage of the 25-30% that mapped? Is it uniform?

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by SEQadmin2




              NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
              Today, 06:46 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
            0 responses
            22 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
            0 responses
            14 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            68 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            48 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...