Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Amative
    Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 45

    RNA-Seq alignment issue

    Hello all,

    I have been given paired-end RNA-Seq files to align against a couple of references. I used Bowtie2 to do the job. The alignment results were very low in most of the cases (less than 5% overall alignment rate).Now, we are thinking this might be caused by either contamination or mix up samples.

    Any suggestion what to do in such case?
    Thank you in advance
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    Bioinformatically, there's nothing you can do, other than help the people to know what went wrong.

    For starters, spot-check some random high quality reads, BLAST them against nr, see if you can determine what they are.

    Try aligning to the whole genome to see how much of the library was genomic.

    See if there are certain highly repetitive reads (like Illumina adapters) taking up a lot of reads.

    And of course see if the run overall was of good enough quality for you to believe that your reads are accurate.

    Comment

    • rboettcher
      Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 71

      #3
      Hi Amative,

      what kind of reference did you provide? Bowtie2 is not splicing aware, so it is not able to deal with reads spanning splice junctions. Therefore, it can only be used to align against the transcriptome (for RNAseq). This is why TopHat was created to align against the whole genome.

      Regards

      Comment

      • Amative
        Member
        • Dec 2011
        • 45

        #4
        Thanks swbarnes2 & rboettcher,

        @swbarnes2
        • I tried to blast the first ten reads from one of the samples I have, blast results were not that good. I tried to align against the available sequences of the two of the top blast hits. Same low alignment rate.
        • I checked for adapters, sequences are already trimmed.


        @rboettcher
        Yes, I am aligning against the transcriptome sequences.

        Comment

        • GenoMax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 7142

          #5
          Originally posted by Amative View Post
          I tried to blast the first ten reads from one of the samples I have, blast results were not that good.
          You probably want to go into the file some ways. With illumina atleast the first hundred (or more) sequences may not represent the best of the lot since they are generally from the edge of the flowcell/start of the lane.

          You may also want to use this tool to do some screening: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.a.../fastq_screen/

          Comment

          • Amative
            Member
            • Dec 2011
            • 45

            #6
            Thanks GenoMax, for the suggestion I am working on it.

            I like the fastq_screen It saves some time!

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
              by SEQadmin2


              Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


              The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
              ...
              06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
              by SEQadmin2


              With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


              Introduction

              Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
              05-22-2026, 06:42 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            24 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
            0 responses
            41 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
            0 responses
            48 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
            0 responses
            49 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...