Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rainbird
    Member
    • Dec 2012
    • 16

    Snp calling between samples

    There is a reference genome for subspecies A available. We did a resequencing for subspecies B and subspecies C using Hiseq 2000 and we'd like to know the SNP diversity(difference in allele frequency) between subspecies B and subspecies C.

    We know there are substantial differences among subspecies A, B and C. So, what is the best way to find the SNP diversity between B and C? Should we do snp calling for subspecies B or C separately based on subspecies A reference genome (I used samtools) and then merge the results ? It seems to me we need a more efficient way to do the job but I don't know much (cortex ?).

    Thanks in advance.
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    Align both samples to your best reference, then use samtools mpileup on both .bams together.

    Comment

    • Rainbird
      Member
      • Dec 2012
      • 16

      #3
      Thanks swbarnes2

      Could you explain a little more why "use samtools mpileup on both .bams together" will work? In that case, we still need the reference genome from subspecies A, right?

      Another thing is that: if there are more than 1 non-reference allels reported, the samtools only gives out the depth of the 1st non-reference allel (as listed in DP4). Also, although the 1/1 indicates homozygous alternate, I don't understand the meaning of the PL value which is "131,59,26,91,0,85" (as shown below). How can we get the depths and other information for the 2nd alternate ?

      chr2 213263 . A C,T 72 . DP=14;VDB=0.0355;AF1=1;AC1=2;DP4=0,0,9,4;MQ=56;FQ=-60 GT:PL:GQ 1/1:131,59,26,91,0,85:63

      Comment

      • Rainbird
        Member
        • Dec 2012
        • 16

        #4
        Anyone can help?

        Comment

        • Khen
          Member
          • Mar 2012
          • 11

          #5
          Calling species B and C against the reference together just saves space. And yes, you will still need to use the reference genome. The output is slightly different however, so what you will get is an extra GT field:
          Code:
          chr2	213263	.	A	C,T	72	.	DP=14;VDB=0.0355;AF1=1;AC1=2;DP4=0,0,9,4;MQ=56;FQ=-60	GT:<Genotype of A>	GT:<Genotype of B>
          I'm pretty sure that the PL field is reporting the quality score of all of the allelic possibilities, which is why you see six of them. You will have to consult the documentation for how to get multiple sample depth information.
          Also, I find that the Broad Institute does a much better job documentation than does sourceforge or 1000genomes.org. Since samtools and gatk both use VCF as the standard output, you might want to start with the GATK documentation if not just switch to GATK altogether.

          Hope this helps.

          Comment

          • Rainbird
            Member
            • Dec 2012
            • 16

            #6
            Thanks Khen.
            If I undertand correctly, samtools is designed for diploid genome. If there are 2 alleles in your sample other than the allele in the reference genome (for example, the reference genome has a T, and you have a A and a G in your sample), samtool might not work well.

            Is there any tool specifically designed to find allele frequency in your own samples regardless what is in the reference genome?

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            6 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            11 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            19 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            53 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...