Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • griffon42
    Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 23

    RNA-Seq analysis: Paired design with mutliple time points

    Hi all,

    I've got a relatively complex RNA-Seq experiment and I was hoping to get some input on analysis options. I've dug around quite extensively in these forums and others, but haven't been able to find an experimental design that's quite the same.

    Essentially, I have a set up which has 2 groups based on the outcome of an infection (e.g. no-complications vs. complications). For each group, I have 4 time points (e.g. pre-infection, early infection, late infection, very late infection). So, the data are essentially "paired" - but rather than a single pair (e.g. pre-infection vs. post-infection), they've got multiple time points. For each group-timepoint, I have 10 biological replicates for RNA-Seq on tissue samples.

    Example:
    -No-complications
    Patient 1: pre, early, late, very late
    Patient 2: pre, early, late, very late

    Patient 10: pre, early, late, very late

    -Complications
    Patient 1: pre, early, late, very late
    Patient 2: pre, early, late, very late

    Patient 10: pre, early, late, very late

    Though there are several, the primary objective is to observe gene expression differences in the no-complications vs. complications group. This would be relatively straightforward for a traditional paired experiment using a GLM-type of analysis. In fact, I plan to start by using DESeq with GLM analysis JUST comparing the first 2 time points (pre vs. early). However, it would be great to take advantage of the additional time course data in a unified analysis.

    Other than clustering/heatmap types of data exploration, can anyone offer additional advice on how to manage this type of design from an RNA-Seq perspective? There are a few microarray-type tools available, but I don't think they're well tailored to these type of data.

    Any advice would be much appreciated. Thank you in advance.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
    by SEQadmin2


    Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


    The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
    ...
    06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:37 AM
0 responses
6 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
16 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
51 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
0 responses
110 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...