Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Amative
    Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 45

    Re-Annotate legacy gene predictions

    Hello everyone,

    I have a number of single-ended samples generated by Illumina-based Hsq2000. About 10 to 35 million 58-bp. A legacy annotation of an organism "genemark predictions". What are my option to redo the annotations using the short read files I have.

    Any tools, steps , suggestions, examples are really appreciated

    Thank you!
  • jimmybee
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 119

    #2
    Either de-novo assemble all SE HiSeq reads and predict genes on the assembled contigs, or map those reads against the current annotation and identify where improvements can be made

    Denovo: Velvet, ALLPATHS, SOAPdenovo
    Mapping: BFAST, Bowtie(2), BWA
    Gene Prediction: FGENESH, GenMark, Genscan, Glimmer ....
    Last edited by jimmybee; 04-22-2013, 02:50 PM.

    Comment

    • Amative
      Member
      • Dec 2011
      • 45

      #3
      Thanks Jimmy,
      I am not quite sure I understand exactly how to do your second suggestion. Because I have already done the alignment to the genome and that is what caused my question.

      Here is how this whole re-annotation idea came up:
      I aligned the SE reads (different time points of fruit development and different tissues) to the reference genome. Then viewed the (Genome + Old predicted genes + Alignment results "BAM") using GBrowse. At this point we noticed that the reads are not always aligning perfectly to a number of the genes.

      Comment

      • Wallysb01
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2011
        • 286

        #4
        I would highly suggest a two pronged strategy for use inside maker.

        1) Use tophat and cufflinks RABT annotations to do transcriptome assembly on the genome.
        2) Use trinity to de novo assemble the reads into transcripts.

        Then reannotate your genome inside maker. You will be able to pass the legacy annotation through, along with refseq alignments from other species or a variety of other lines of evidence along with your de novo and reference based transcriptome assembly.

        Finally, update your maker annotations with PASA using your de novo assembled transcripts.

        Comment

        • Amative
          Member
          • Dec 2011
          • 45

          #5
          Thanks a lot Wally
          Sounds interesting, and a lot of work. I have never used any of the tools you suggested and excited to do so. Do you know of any links or documents and that list these steps with more details (not the manual of each), as I am no expert and need as much data as possible about this pipeline.

          Have a good weekend

          Comment

          • Wallysb01
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2011
            • 286

            #6
            Originally posted by Amative View Post
            Thanks a lot Wally
            Sounds interesting, and a lot of work. I have never used any of the tools you suggested and excited to do so. Do you know of any links or documents and that list these steps with more details (not the manual of each), as I am no expert and need as much data as possible about this pipeline.

            Have a good weekend
            Yeah, I did something similar for this paper: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/14/49

            I did not feed legacy annotations to Maker though. Instead I merged Ensembl and NCBI annotations in EVM then fed the merged annotations to Maker.

            If I were to do it again though, I'd probably have just skipped EVM and fed both Ensembl and NCBI into Maker.

            Comment

            • Amative
              Member
              • Dec 2011
              • 45

              #7
              Excellent, Thanks Wally.
              I will definitely take a look at it, and hopefully I can do something similar.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                by SEQadmin2



                Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                Today, 05:17 AM
              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
              0 responses
              7 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
              0 responses
              29 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
              0 responses
              28 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              27 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...