Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mknut
    replied
    Table C1: Options common to all BLAST+ search applications.
    So yes, it seems that this command should be applicable to BLASTp. It also seems that the proper syntax to use is with double quotes, containing numerical argument as well as the rest (single quotes might work) so:
    Code:
    -outfmt "6 qcovs"
    If this does not work, you might want to think about calculating the coverage % with a script, taking query lenght from your BLASTp query and alignment length from 'length' of BLASTp output.

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    Originally posted by Tsuyoshi View Post
    I am thinking whether qcovs is only available for blast but not for blastp.
    The manual seems to indicate that those options are available for all blast+ programs. Have you tried 'std qcovs'?

    Or perhaps the command needs to be (note: single quotes):

    Code:
    -outfmt 6 [COLOR="Red"]'[/COLOR]qcovs[COLOR="Red"]'[/COLOR]
    Last edited by GenoMax; 04-23-2013, 04:47 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tsuyoshi
    replied
    Originally posted by mknut View Post
    You can try this:

    Update to the newest BLAST+ package.
    Use
    Code:
    -outfmt
    , which allows the output to be in custom format. You can find documentation on custom output format here (BLAST Command Line Applications User Manual, Appendix C, option 'outfmt'). From what I see the values to use are
    Code:
    -outfmt 6 qcovs
    , which should add query coverage per sequence value at the end of each output line and save it in tab-delimited format.
    Thank you mknut.

    I tried adding qcovs, however, the output files did not contain the qcovs information. For example, if I input the command as outfmt "qacc sacc evalue bitscore qcovs", the output files only contained qacc sacc evalue bitoscore. I am thinking whether qcovs is only available for blast but not for blastp.

    Leave a comment:


  • mknut
    replied
    You can try this:

    Update to the newest BLAST+ package.
    Use
    Code:
    -outfmt
    , which allows the output to be in custom format. You can find documentation on custom output format here (BLAST Command Line Applications User Manual, Appendix C, option 'outfmt'). From what I see the values to use are
    Code:
    -outfmt 6 qcovs
    , which should add query coverage per sequence value at the end of each output line and save it in tab-delimited format.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tsuyoshi
    started a topic Basic question about local BLASTP

    Basic question about local BLASTP

    Hello.

    I am using local BLASTP program to blast my protein sequences (around 600 sequences) against other organism's whole proteome database. What I want to do is to filter the output by some parameters. I have applied a reciprocal best_hit strategy, and the parameters were set as 'max identity > 30%', e<1e-10 and best_hit_overhang 0.25). However, in some cases, for example, the max identity between one best-hit set of query and subject sequence was as high as 40%, the query coverage was only 2%. Therefor, I want to exclude the best-hit sequences like that by setting a parameter like 'query coverage > 30%'.

    The web based blast on NCBI could show the query coverage, but I do not know what is the command line for local BLASTP to output "query coverage". Please give me some ideas to resolve this problem. Thanks!
    Last edited by Tsuyoshi; 04-22-2013, 05:18 PM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Pathogen Surveillance with Advanced Genomic Tools
    by seqadmin




    The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for proactive pathogen surveillance systems. As ongoing threats like avian influenza and newly emerging infections continue to pose risks, researchers are working to improve how quickly and accurately pathogens can be identified and tracked. In a recent SEQanswers webinar, two experts discussed how next-generation sequencing (NGS) and machine learning are shaping efforts to monitor viral variation and trace the origins of infectious...
    03-24-2025, 11:48 AM
  • seqadmin
    New Genomics Tools and Methods Shared at AGBT 2025
    by seqadmin


    This year’s Advances in Genome Biology and Technology (AGBT) General Meeting commemorated the 25th anniversary of the event at its original venue on Marco Island, Florida. While this year’s event didn’t include high-profile musical performances, the industry announcements and cutting-edge research still drew the attention of leading scientists.

    The Headliner
    The biggest announcement was Roche stepping back into the sequencing platform market. In the years since...
    03-03-2025, 01:39 PM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 03-20-2025, 05:03 AM
0 responses
41 views
0 reactions
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 03-19-2025, 07:27 AM
0 responses
49 views
0 reactions
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 03-18-2025, 12:50 PM
0 responses
36 views
0 reactions
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 03-03-2025, 01:15 PM
0 responses
192 views
0 reactions
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...