Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tsuyoshi
    Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 24

    Basic question about local BLASTP

    Hello.

    I am using local BLASTP program to blast my protein sequences (around 600 sequences) against other organism's whole proteome database. What I want to do is to filter the output by some parameters. I have applied a reciprocal best_hit strategy, and the parameters were set as 'max identity > 30%', e<1e-10 and best_hit_overhang 0.25). However, in some cases, for example, the max identity between one best-hit set of query and subject sequence was as high as 40%, the query coverage was only 2%. Therefor, I want to exclude the best-hit sequences like that by setting a parameter like 'query coverage > 30%'.

    The web based blast on NCBI could show the query coverage, but I do not know what is the command line for local BLASTP to output "query coverage". Please give me some ideas to resolve this problem. Thanks!
    Last edited by Tsuyoshi; 04-22-2013, 05:18 PM.
  • mknut
    Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 23

    #2
    You can try this:

    Update to the newest BLAST+ package.
    Use
    Code:
    -outfmt
    , which allows the output to be in custom format. You can find documentation on custom output format here (BLAST Command Line Applications User Manual, Appendix C, option 'outfmt'). From what I see the values to use are
    Code:
    -outfmt 6 qcovs
    , which should add query coverage per sequence value at the end of each output line and save it in tab-delimited format.

    Comment

    • Tsuyoshi
      Member
      • Sep 2012
      • 24

      #3
      Originally posted by mknut View Post
      You can try this:

      Update to the newest BLAST+ package.
      Use
      Code:
      -outfmt
      , which allows the output to be in custom format. You can find documentation on custom output format here (BLAST Command Line Applications User Manual, Appendix C, option 'outfmt'). From what I see the values to use are
      Code:
      -outfmt 6 qcovs
      , which should add query coverage per sequence value at the end of each output line and save it in tab-delimited format.
      Thank you mknut.

      I tried adding qcovs, however, the output files did not contain the qcovs information. For example, if I input the command as outfmt "qacc sacc evalue bitscore qcovs", the output files only contained qacc sacc evalue bitoscore. I am thinking whether qcovs is only available for blast but not for blastp.

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Originally posted by Tsuyoshi View Post
        I am thinking whether qcovs is only available for blast but not for blastp.
        The manual seems to indicate that those options are available for all blast+ programs. Have you tried 'std qcovs'?

        Or perhaps the command needs to be (note: single quotes):

        Code:
        -outfmt 6 [COLOR="Red"]'[/COLOR]qcovs[COLOR="Red"]'[/COLOR]
        Last edited by GenoMax; 04-23-2013, 04:47 AM.

        Comment

        • mknut
          Member
          • Jul 2012
          • 23

          #5
          Table C1: Options common to all BLAST+ search applications.
          So yes, it seems that this command should be applicable to BLASTp. It also seems that the proper syntax to use is with double quotes, containing numerical argument as well as the rest (single quotes might work) so:
          Code:
          -outfmt "6 qcovs"
          If this does not work, you might want to think about calculating the coverage % with a script, taking query lenght from your BLASTp query and alignment length from 'length' of BLASTp output.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          32 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          43 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          29 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...