Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Guigra
    Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 17

    #1

    How working with sam format and blast?

    Hi,

    I'm trying to work with the BWA, but I'm having a problem.
    After doing the alignment with BWA, I need to pass the generated file to fasta format, so I can make a blast.
    But when I do this, apparently the fasta file generated comter seems only the reads. Lose alignment. Anyone know what's happening?
    I use te samtools to pass the file in sam format for bam format, and after I use the blast2fastx to convert the alignment in bam format to fasta format.
    I don't know if have some influence, but I'm work with the paired-end alignment.
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    Converting from SAM or BAM to fasta will result in information loss, unless the converter happens to store all of the alignment information in the description line (and then blast keeps it).

    After using bwa your reads are aligned, why are you then blasting things? If you describe what you're really trying to do we might be able to tell you a more efficient way.

    Comment

    • Guigra
      Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 17

      #3
      I did the alignment using BWA, with a reference genome and my reads. Then I had to make a blast alignment I generated to verify that the generated alignment contained some sequence of chloroplast DNA.

      Comment

      • jimmybee
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2010
        • 119

        #4
        Originally posted by Guigra View Post
        I did the alignment using BWA, with a reference genome and my reads. Then I had to make a blast alignment I generated to verify that the generated alignment contained some sequence of chloroplast DNA.
        How about doing it the other way around? Filter your reads using BLAST against a chloroplast DNA database, and then use the remaining reads with BWA to map against the genome

        Unless you want to identify chloroplast insertions in the nuclear genome?

        Comment

        • Guigra
          Member
          • Apr 2013
          • 17

          #5
          Actually I'm trying to check if material extraction for sequencing was done correctly without leftover remnants of chloroplast DNA.
          Your tip solved my problem, thank you! You know how to make this filter in the BWA or bowtie, or some other program? If you know tell me how can I do?

          Comment

          • jimmybee
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2010
            • 119

            #6
            Originally posted by Guigra View Post
            Actually I'm trying to check if material extraction for sequencing was done correctly without leftover remnants of chloroplast DNA.
            Your tip solved my problem, thank you! You know how to make this filter in the BWA or bowtie, or some other program? If you know tell me how can I do?
            Well you could align reads to the chloroplast genome of your choice, then extract unmapped reads (something like samtools view -F 4....you'll have to double check the flags) and use that to input into BWA for your actual alignment.

            Comment

            • Guigra
              Member
              • Apr 2013
              • 17

              #7
              Originally posted by jimmybee View Post
              Well you could align reads to the chloroplast genome of your choice, then extract unmapped reads (something like samtools view -F 4....you'll have to double check the flags) and use that to input into BWA for your actual alignment.
              Thanks for the help! I will use your tip.

              Comment

              • chadn737
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2009
                • 392

                #8
                Or just included the chloroplast genome in the reference with the nuclear genome and do the entire alignment in one go.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • kinpict.com
                  Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                  by kinpict.com
                  The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
                  Today, 06:37 PM
                • SEQadmin2
                  16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                  by SEQadmin2





                  NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
                  10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
                0 responses
                27 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
                0 responses
                35 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
                2 responses
                56 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post kinpict.com  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
                0 responses
                175 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...