Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vivienne_lovely
    Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 20

    #1

    The low mapping rate

    Hi all,
    I just got some RNA-seq data and mapped them to hg19 by tophat, the RNA enrichment was based on RiboMinus rRNA depletion,
    but the mapping rate is just 41%. How to explain this? What should I do with those unmapped reads next? I am really new in this field, would you please help me? Any reply will be appreciate.
    Vivienne
    Last edited by vivienne_lovely; 05-16-2013, 12:34 AM. Reason: add some information
  • emolinari
    Member
    • May 2013
    • 47

    #2
    Hi Vivienne,

    I am experiencing the same issue. I have BLASTed my unmapped reads and I can clearly see that there is a lot of rRNA contamination.
    You can try to do the same, I have realized that is quite common in ribo depleted samples!
    Manu

    Comment

    • Wallysb01
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 286

      #3
      Ribodepleted RNAseq still have substantial rRNA, its just a lot less than without it. Anyway, that shouldn't effect the mappability for the reads.

      Vivienne, have you run fastqc or fastx quality stats on your reads to try to see what might be going on with the reads themselves? They might not be mapping due to low quality, base pair biases, or adapter contamination. In some cases trimming could help the mappability.

      Also, from what kind of sample did you do an RNA extraction? Is it possible there is a lot of microbial RNA being sequenced?

      Comment

      • vivienne_lovely
        Member
        • Oct 2011
        • 20

        #4
        Manu, thank you very much. I will try to BLASTed my unmapped reads.

        Comment

        • vivienne_lovely
          Member
          • Oct 2011
          • 20

          #5
          Originally posted by emolinari View Post
          Hi Vivienne,

          I am experiencing the same issue. I have BLASTed my unmapped reads and I can clearly see that there is a lot of rRNA contamination.
          You can try to do the same, I have realized that is quite common in ribo depleted samples!
          Manu
          Thank you, Manu, I wil try to BLASTed my unmapped reads.

          Comment

          • vivienne_lovely
            Member
            • Oct 2011
            • 20

            #6
            Originally posted by Wallysb01 View Post
            Ribodepleted RNAseq still have substantial rRNA, its just a lot less than without it. Anyway, that shouldn't effect the mappability for the reads.

            Vivienne, have you run fastqc or fastx quality stats on your reads to try to see what might be going on with the reads themselves? They might not be mapping due to low quality, base pair biases, or adapter contamination. In some cases trimming could help the mappability.

            Also, from what kind of sample did you do an RNA extraction? Is it possible there is a lot of microbial RNA being sequenced?
            Hi, Wallysb01
            I already run the fastqc, and I also filtered the low quality reads and trimmed adapter contaminations. But I did not pay attention to the microbial RNA. Thank you for your reply, it really helps a lot.
            Vivienne

            Comment

            • snetmcom
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2008
              • 159

              #7
              Have you taken the unaligned reads and try to map them?

              Comment

              • dstorey
                Junior Member
                • Feb 2013
                • 5

                #8
                It also matters how closely related your sample is to a reference genome and the settings you used for mapping.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                  Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                  ...
                  10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                  We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                  ...
                  09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
                0 responses
                27 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
                0 responses
                20 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                0 responses
                36 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                0 responses
                43 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...