Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pengchy
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 116

    #1

    Tophat junctions.bed 1-3bp fluctuate boundary

    Hi,

    I have run with tophat2 for many samples seperately and got junctions.bed files. When I combined all the junctions.bed file together to get the information of junction boundary and coverage score, I found the boundary between samples fluctuate with 1-3bp very often. Here are examples:
    Code:
    C189205324      196     484     JUNC0001692     0       -
    C189205324      199     770     JUNC0001693     0       -
    C189205324      203     775     JUNC0001694     0       -
    C189205324      206     770     JUNC0001695     0       -
    C189205324      210     771     JUNC0001696     0       -
    C189205324      213     772     JUNC0001697     0       -
    C189205324      219     774     JUNC0001698     0       -
    C189205324      220     775     JUNC0001699     0       -
    C189205324      220     804     JUNC0001700     0       -
    C189205324      470     787     JUNC0001701     0       -
    C189205324      470     817     JUNC0001702     0       -
    C189205324      470     818     JUNC0001703     0       -
    C189205324      470     821     JUNC0001704     0       -
    C189205324      470     823     JUNC0001705     0       -
    C189205324      470     824     JUNC0001706     0       -
    C189205324      470     827     JUNC0001707     0       -
    C189205324      470     830     JUNC0001708     0       -
    C189205324      474     784     JUNC0001709     0       -
    C189205324      478     782     JUNC0001710     0       -
    C189205324      490     777     JUNC0001711     0       -
    C189205324      490     779     JUNC0001712     0       -
    C189205324      490     782     JUNC0001713     0       -
    C189205324      490     787     JUNC0001714     0       -
    C189205324      490     798     JUNC0001715     0       -
    C189205324      492     774     JUNC0001716     0       -
    C189205324      492     775     JUNC0001717     0       -
    C189205324      496     775     JUNC0001718     0       -
    C189205324      497     775     JUNC0001719     0       -
    C189205324      499     795     JUNC0001720     0       -
    C189205324      500     785     JUNC0001721     0       -
    C189205324      501     797     JUNC0001722     0       -
    C189205324      851     1028    JUNC0001723     0       -
    The header of these columns are: scaffoldID start end junctionID score strand. the scores were set to 0.
    I checked manually for different samples found that different samples have different boundary.
  • pengchy
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 116

    #2
    Code:
    C183745259      41      302     JUNC00000001    76      -       41      302     255,0,0 2       89,89   0,172
    C184664061      52      363     JUNC00000002    404     +       52      363     255,0,0 2       89,89   0,222
    C184770029      92      344     JUNC00000003    2567    +       92      344     255,0,0 2       89,89   0,163
    C184908199      10      217     JUNC00000004    9       -       10      217     255,0,0 2       54,45   0,162
    C185216318      146     332     JUNC00000005    2       +       146     332     255,0,0 2       49,60   0,126
    C185216318      130     378     JUNC00000006    119     +       130     378     255,0,0 2       87,89   0,159
    I have checked the bed again and found that the showed position in the igv shift according to the column 11. Sorry for the missunderstand.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
      by SEQadmin2



      CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

      Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
      ...
      07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
      by SEQadmin2


      Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

      The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
      ...
      07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
    0 responses
    33 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
    0 responses
    43 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...