Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HESmith
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 512

    #1

    proper normalization of ChIP-Seq data

    We're comparing a histone modification in control samples vs. experimental samples in which the modifying enzyme is overexpressed. Western blotting indicates ~3X increase in the amount of modified histones, and qPCR of ChIPed material shows a similar increase for known target sites. Comparison of ChIP-Seq data sets indicate that the distribution of the modification is unchanged (i.e., the same peaks are detected in control and experiment). This result was anticipated by other experiments, so nothing earth-shattering.

    The question: what is the appropriate method/algorithm for normalizing the ChIP-Seq data that demonstrates the enrichment we observe at these identical peaks? Most of the available tools seem designed for detecting different peaks, using the same (normalized) number of reads. In our case, however, such normalization essentially suppresses the difference in magnitude we detect by the other methods.

    I'd appreciate suggestions from the more statistically-savvy members of the community.

    Thanks,
    Harold
    Last edited by HESmith; 05-24-2013, 12:17 PM. Reason: clarification
  • aurélie teissandier
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 1

    #2
    Hi Harold,

    I have the same problem. Do you have an answer to your question? Which method do you use to compare your different samples?

    Thanks
    Aurélie

    Comment

    • mknut
      Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 23

      #3
      To investigate differences between peaks at the same positions I use DiffBind. It looks like you have already done peak occupancy analysis, the next step would be binding affinity analysis. Binding affinity analysis is basically investigation of differences in enrichment at same peaks across different samples - seems to be exactly what you are after. DiffBind is an R package and is actually quite easy to use and does not require a lot of expertise in R.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • kinpict.com
        Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by kinpict.com
        The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
        Today, 06:37 PM
      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2





        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
        10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
      2 responses
      56 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post kinpict.com  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      175 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...