We have been running scaffolding with scarpa (there are reports that this should give good results), however we have several problems.
The most interesting one is that we get the output below. The largest size is correct, but the total length and estimated coverage are negative...?
Does anybody have some experience with scarpa and/or has seen anything like this before? Does anyone know how these numbers are calculated and what can explain this?
N50: 1073053
Largest size: 1073053
Total number: 228062
Total length: -1240010655
--- Statistics for library #1 (support: 0, confidence: 0) --- Success ratio: -nan (0/0) Estimated coverage: -6294.36 Minimum support is set to 2
./scarpa.sh: line 30: 14760 Floating point exception(core dumped)
The most interesting one is that we get the output below. The largest size is correct, but the total length and estimated coverage are negative...?
Does anybody have some experience with scarpa and/or has seen anything like this before? Does anyone know how these numbers are calculated and what can explain this?
N50: 1073053
Largest size: 1073053
Total number: 228062
Total length: -1240010655
--- Statistics for library #1 (support: 0, confidence: 0) --- Success ratio: -nan (0/0) Estimated coverage: -6294.36 Minimum support is set to 2
./scarpa.sh: line 30: 14760 Floating point exception(core dumped)
