Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ahstram
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 1

    determing zygosity with 1000 genomes SAM format data

    Hi there,

    What methods are typically used to determine zygosity with the SAM files located on the 1000 genomes FTP?

    I've noticed that in the case of very low coverage (for example, 1x), samtool's pileup maq consensus column will state that the consensus basepair is whatever it has a read for.

    But in the case of 1x coverage, how can we be sure that this individual is truly homozygous for some allele at a position? Wouldn't this require higher coverage? My understanding is that the read is, with a 50/50 chance, either from the paternal or maternal chromosome.

    Could someone post a link explaining how reads are spread between the maternal and paternal chromosome?

    Am I correct in thinking that the sequence reads are evenly split between maternal/paternal chromosomes (as number of reads-->infinity)? If this is the case, I figure that using a binomial, with p=0.5 (assumption), and a desired phred consensus score of 20, we would need at least 7 reads with phred score >=20 in order to know we have read both the paternal and maternal chromosome, and be able to say that an individual is either heterozygous or homozygous for some allele with a phred-probability of 20 or greater, as ((1-0.5)(0.5))^7<0.01.

    With less than 7 reads, I would only be able to say "this individual has at least one of this allele at this position", not knowing if that individual is homozygous for that allele, or heterozygous, correct?

    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    -- Alex
    Last edited by ahstram; 12-04-2009, 04:50 PM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
    by SEQadmin2



    Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
    ...
    Today, 11:10 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
    by SEQadmin2



    Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

    There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
    Yesterday, 05:17 AM
  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
0 responses
6 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
0 responses
9 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
31 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...